» Articles » PMID: 39367462

Insights and Networks: Methodological Assessment and Scientometric Analysis of Economic Evaluations in Dentistry

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Oct 4
PMID 39367462
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Assessing the methodological quality of economic evaluations (EEs) is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. The study aimed to evaluate EEs in restorative dentistry and endodontics, while also analyzing the scientific landscape of researchers and publications through co-authorship and citation network analysis providing an insight into the distribution of scientific expertise.

Methodology: A systematic search for relevant articles from 2012 to 2022 was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCO. The ten-point Drummond checklist was used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies. Bibliometric data for network analysis were extracted from the Dimensions database and visualized using VOSviewer software.

Results: Of the 37 articles, 81.08% scored good, 16.21% average, and 2.7% poor on the methodological rating scale. Most of the included studies were in Q1 journals, with limited representation in Q2 and Q3 journals. Compliance was highest in Q2 journals (95%), followed by Q1 (88.36%), while it dropped to 40% for Q3 journals. Co-authorship analysis revealed a dense network of researchers, with Prof. Falk Schwendicke V. having a significant influence. Moreover, the Journal of Dentistry had the highest impact, followed by Journal of Endodontics and BMC Oral Health.

Conclusions: Despite a diverse scientific landscape, participation from developing countries was limited emphasizing the need for inclusivity and diversity in the scientific network. While the quantity of good-quality studies was encouraging, the overall quality of evidence remains paramount for decision-making in healthcare policy and practice. Therefore, continuous efforts to improve methodological rigor and reporting practices are essential to contribute robust evidence.

References
1.
Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Schwendicke F . Cost-effectiveness of repairing versus replacing composite or amalgam restorations. J Dent. 2016; 54:41-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.008. View

2.
Elhennawy K, Jost-Brinkmann P, Manton D, Paris S, Schwendicke F . Managing molars with severe molar-incisor hypomineralization: A cost-effectiveness analysis within German healthcare. J Dent. 2017; 63:65-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.020. View

3.
Broden J, Davidson T, Fransson H . Cost-effectiveness of pulp capping and root canal treatment of young permanent teeth. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019; 77(4):275-281. DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1538536. View

4.
Doubilet P, Weinstein M, McNeil B . Use and misuse of the term "cost effective" in medicine. N Engl J Med. 1986; 314(4):253-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198601233140421. View

5.
Rohlin M, Mileman P . Decision analysis in dentistry--the last 30 years. J Dent. 2000; 28(7):453-68. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00027-0. View