Units Containing Telomeric Repeats Are Prevalent in Subtelomeric Regions of a Mesorhabditis Isolate Collected from the Republic of Korea

Overview

Journal Genes Genomics

Specialty Genetics

Date 2024 Oct 4

PMID 39367283

Authors

Seoyeon Kim

Jun Kim

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Mesorhabditis is known for its somatic genome being only a small portion of the germline genome due to programmed DNA elimination. This phenotype may be associated with the maintenance of telomeres at the ends of fragmented somatic chromosomes.

Objective: To comprehensively investigate the telomeric regions of Mesorhabditis nematodes at the sequence level, we endeavored to collect a Mesorhabditis nematode in the Republic of Korea and acquire its highly contiguous genome sequences.

Methods: We isolated a Mesorhabditis nematode and assembled its 108-Mb draft genome using both 6.3 Gb (53 ×) of short-read and 3.0 Gb (25 × , N50 = 5.7 kb) of nanopore-based long-read sequencing data. Our genome assembly exhibits comparable quality to the public genome of Mesorhabditis belari in terms of contiguity and evolutionary conserved genes.

Results: Unexpectedly, our Mesorhabditis genome has many more interstitial telomeric sequences (ITSs), specifically subtelomeric ones, compared to the genomes of Caenorhabditis elegans and M. belari. Moreover, several subtelomeric sequences containing ITSs had 4-26 homologous sequences, implying they are highly repetitive. Based on this highly repetitive nature, we hypothesize that subtelomeric ITSs might have accumulated through the action of transposable elements containing ITSs.

Conclusions: It still remains elusive whether these ITS-containing units are associated with programmed DNA elimination, but they may facilitate new telomere formation after DNA elimination. Our genomic resources for Mesorhabditis can aid in understanding how its distinct phenotypes have evolved.

References

Altschul S, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E, Lipman D . Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990; 215(3):403-10. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. View

Arnoult N, Karlseder J . Complex interactions between the DNA-damage response and mammalian telomeres. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015; 22(11):859-66. PMC: 4739752. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3092. View

Wong M, Juan E, Chelluri S, Wang P, Pahmeier F, Castillo-Rojas B . The Inflammasome Pathway is Activated by Dengue Virus Non-structural Protein 1 and is Protective During Dengue Virus Infection. bioRxiv. 2023; . PMC: 10543007. DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.21.558875. View

Bolzan A . Interstitial telomeric sequences in vertebrate chromosomes: Origin, function, instability and evolution. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2017; 773:51-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2017.04.002. View

Cesare A, Kaul Z, Cohen S, Napier C, Pickett H, Neumann A . Spontaneous occurrence of telomeric DNA damage response in the absence of chromosome fusions. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009; 16(12):1244-51. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1725. View

Chaux-Jukic F, ODonnell S, Craig R, Eberhard S, Vallon O, Xu Z . Architecture and evolution of subtelomeres in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49(13):7571-7587. PMC: 8287924. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab534. View

Danecek P, Bonfield J, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard M . Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021; 10(2). PMC: 7931819. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008. View

de Lange T . How telomeres solve the end-protection problem. Science. 2009; 326(5955):948-52. PMC: 2819049. DOI: 10.1126/science.1170633. View

Dedukh D, Krasikova A . Delete and survive: strategies of programmed genetic material elimination in eukaryotes. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021; 97(1):195-216. PMC: 9292451. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12796. View

10.

Delahaye C, Nicolas J . Sequencing DNA with nanopores: Troubles and biases. PLoS One. 2021; 16(10):e0257521. PMC: 8486125. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257521. View

11.

Dion-Cote A . A hotspot for new genes. Elife. 2019; 8. PMC: 6715402. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.50136. View

12.

Drotos K, Zagoskin M, Kess T, Gregory T, Wyngaard G . Throwing away DNA: programmed downsizing in somatic nuclei. Trends Genet. 2022; 38(5):483-500. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.02.003. View

13.

Estrem B, Wang J . Programmed DNA elimination in the parasitic nematode Ascaris. PLoS Pathog. 2023; 19(2):e1011087. PMC: 9894435. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011087. View

14.

Grigorev K, Foox J, Bezdan D, Butler D, Luxton J, Reed J . Haplotype diversity and sequence heterogeneity of human telomeres. Genome Res. 2021; 31(7):1269-1279. PMC: 8256856. DOI: 10.1101/gr.274639.120. View

15.

Grosmaire M, Launay C, Siegwald M, Brugiere T, Estrada-Virrueta L, Berger D . Males as somatic investment in a parthenogenetic nematode. Science. 2019; 363(6432):1210-1213. DOI: 10.1126/science.aau0099. View

16.

Harman R, Das S, Bartlett A, Rauner G, Donahue L, Van de Walle G . Beyond tradition and convention: benefits of non-traditional model organisms in cancer research. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2020; 40(1):47-69. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-020-09930-6. View

17.

He Y, Luo X, Zhou B, Hu T, Meng X, Audano P . Long-read assembly of the Chinese rhesus macaque genome and identification of ape-specific structural variants. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):4233. PMC: 6749001. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12174-w. View

18.

Hodgkin J . Karyotype, ploidy, and gene dosage. WormBook. 2007; :1-9. PMC: 4781021. DOI: 10.1895/wormbook.1.3.1. View

19.

Jauhal A, Newcomb R . Assessing genome assembly quality prior to downstream analysis: N50 versus BUSCO. Mol Ecol Resour. 2021; 21(5):1416-1421. DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13364. View

20.

Kim J, Kim C . A beginner's guide to assembling a draft genome and analyzing structural variants with long-read sequencing technologies. STAR Protoc. 2022; 3(3):101506. PMC: 9254108. DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101506. View