» Articles » PMID: 39367106

Inadequate Management of Opioid-induced Constipation in European Cancer Pain Patients: Results of a Real-world, Multicentre, Observational Study ("E-StOIC")

Abstract

Purpose: The objectives of the study were to determine the prevalence of (uncontrolled) OIC, relevant medications / interventions employed by healthcare professionals, and the additional strategies utilised by patients, amongst European patients with cancer pain.

Methods: This study was a prospective observational study conducted at 24 research sites in ten European countries. Cancer patients receiving opioid analgesics for at least a week were recruited, and asked to complete a questionnaire including background information, single question (Are you constipated?), Rome IV diagnostic criteria for OIC, Bowel Function Index (BFI), and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (PAC-QOL). Participants were characterised as having / not having OIC on the basis of the Rome IV diagnostic criteria.

Results: 1200 participants completed the study. 59.5% met the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for OIC: only 61.5% that met these criteria self-reported constipation. 72% participants were prescribed a regular conventional laxative / peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA). However, only 66% took their prescribed laxatives every day. Many participants had utilised other strategies / interventions to manage their OIC. Furthermore, 27% had needed to use suppositories, 26.5% had needed to use an enema, and 8% had had a manual evacuation. The use of PAMORAs, and other novel effective medications, was relatively uncommon.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that management in Europe is often inadequate, and this undoubtedly relates to a combination of inadequate assessment, inappropriate treatment, and inadequate reassessment.

References
1.
Lindberg G, Hamid S, Malfertheiner P, Thomsen O, Bustos Fernandez L, Garisch J . World Gastroenterology Organisation global guideline: Constipation--a global perspective. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011; 45(6):483-7. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31820fb914. View

2.
Walter S, Hallbook O, Gotthard R, Bergmark M, Sjodahl R . A population-based study on bowel habits in a Swedish community: prevalence of faecal incontinence and constipation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002; 37(8):911-6. DOI: 10.1080/003655202760230865. View

3.
Davies A, Leach C, Caponero R, Dickman A, Fuchs D, Paice J . MASCC recommendations on the management of constipation in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2019; 28(1):23-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05016-4. View

4.
Camilleri M, Drossman D, Becker G, Webster L, Davies A, Mawe G . Emerging treatments in neurogastroenterology: a multidisciplinary working group consensus statement on opioid-induced constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014; 26(10):1386-95. PMC: 4358801. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12417. View

5.
Davies A, Leach C, Butler C, Gregory A, Henshaw S, Minton O . Opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer: a "real-world," multicentre, observational study of diagnostic criteria and clinical features. Pain. 2020; 162(1):309-318. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002024. View