» Articles » PMID: 39365415

Value for Solidarity: a Proxy for Community Understanding and Acceptance of the Basic Principles of Community-based Health Insurance in Rural Ethiopia

Overview
Journal Health Econ Rev
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Oct 4
PMID 39365415
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Solidarity is an aspect of human association that gives emphasis to the cohesive social bond that holds a group together and is valued and understood by all members of the group. A lack of understanding of the solidarity principle is one of the main reasons for low population coverage in microhealth insurance schemes. This study aimed to examine the extent to which people value solidarity and the factors that explain the differences.

Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out in two districts of northeast Ethiopia among 1232 randomly selected households which have ever been registered in a community-based health insurance scheme. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with household heads using a standardized questionnaire deployed to an electronic data collection platform. Solidarity was measured using three dimensions: income solidarity, risk solidarity, and cost coverage. Principal component analysis was used to construct composite variables, and the reliability of the tools was checked using Cronbach's alpha. A multivariable analysis was performed using the partial proportional odds model to determine the associations between variables. The degree of association was assessed using the odds ratio, and statistical significance was determined at 95% confidence interval.

Results: Three-quarters (75%) of the respondents rated risk solidarity as high, while 70% and 63% rated income solidarity and cost coverage as high, respectively. Place of residence (AOR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.68, 2.94), wealth index (AOR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.07, 2.12), self-rated health status (AOR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.12, 2.40), trust in insurance schemes (AOR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.30), perceived quality of care (AOR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.33, 2.31) and frequency of outpatient visits (AOR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.30, 3.24) were significant predictors of value for solidarity.

Conclusions: The community placed greater value for solidarity, indicating community understanding and acceptance of the core principles of microhealth insurance. Administrators of the insurance scheme, health authorities, and other actors should strive to create a transparent management system and improve access to high-quality health care, which will facilitate community acceptance of the insurance scheme and its guiding principles.

References
1.
Maritim B, Koon A, Kimaina A, Goudge J . Acceptability of prepayment, social solidarity and cross-subsidies in national health insurance: A mixed methods study in Western Kenya. Front Public Health. 2022; 10:957528. PMC: 9614422. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.957528. View

2.
Muhammad T, Kumar P, Srivastava S . How socioeconomic status, social capital and functional independence are associated with subjective wellbeing among older Indian adults? A structural equation modeling analysis. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):1836. PMC: 9523926. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14215-4. View

3.
Maarse H, Paulus A . Has solidarity survived? A comparative analysis of the effect of social health insurance reform in four European countries. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2003; 28(4):585-614. DOI: 10.1215/03616878-28-4-585. View

4.
Umeh C . Challenges toward achieving universal health coverage in Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, and Tanzania. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018; 33(4):794-805. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2610. View

5.
Hu Y, Zhang Z, Xie J, Wang G . The Outpatient Experience Questionnaire of comprehensive public hospital in China: development, validity and reliability. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016; 29(1):40-46. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw133. View