» Articles » PMID: 39363470

Postoperative Coronal Imbalance in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evolution, Risk Factors, and Clinical Implications

Overview
Journal Neurospine
Date 2024 Oct 4
PMID 39363470
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore the changes in coronal imbalance (CIB) in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) after posterior selective fusion surgery and determine their implications for surgical decision-making.

Methods: One hundred twenty patients were categorized according to the preoperative coronal pattern (type A, coronal balance distance [CBD]<20 mm; type B, CBD≥20 mm and coronal C7 plumbline [C7PL] shifted to the concave side of the curve; type C, CBD≥20 mm and C7PL shifted to the convex side of the curve). CIB group (CIB+) was defined as having a CBD≥20 mm at the 2-year follow-up.

Results: Compared to type A patients, the prevalence of postoperative CIB was higher in type C patients both immediately postoperative (22% vs. 38%, p<0.05) and at the final follow-up (5% vs. 29%, p<0.05), whereas type A patients showed a greater improvement in CBD (9 of 12 vs. 6 of 24, p<0.05) at the final follow-up. The majority of patients in all groups had recovered to type A at the final follow-up (96 of 120). The proximal Cobb-1 strategy reduced the incidence of postoperative CIB (1 of 38) at the 2-year follow-up, especially in preoperative type C patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that type C and overcorrection of the thoracolumbar curve were risk factors for CIB at the 2-year follow-up (p=0.007 and p=0.026, respectively).

Conclusion: Patients with type C CIB in AIS exhibited unsatisfactory restoration, with 29% of them exhibiting CIB at the final follow-up. The selective fusion strategy of proximal Cobb-1 may reduce the risk of postoperative CIB especially when the preoperative coronal pattern is type C.

References
1.
Daubs M, Lenke L, Bridwell K, Kim Y, Hung M, Cheh G . Does correction of preoperative coronal imbalance make a difference in outcomes of adult patients with deformity?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(6):476-83. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182846eb3. View

2.
Bao H, Yan P, Qiu Y, Liu Z, Zhu F . Coronal imbalance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: Prevalence and influence on surgical decision-making for spinal osteotomy. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(9):1227-33. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B9.37273. View

3.
Baghdadi S, Cahill P, Anari J, Flynn J, Upasani V, Bachmann K . Evidence Behind Upper Instrumented Vertebra Selection in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic and Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev. 2022; 9(9). DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00255. View

4.
Matsumura A, Iwamae M, Namikawa T, Kato M, Hori Y, Hidaka N . Spontaneous Improvement of Postoperative Coronal Imbalance Following Selective Thoracolumbar-Lumbar Fusion in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. World Neurosurg. 2021; 151:e241-e249. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.024. View

5.
Mao S, Li S, Ma Y, Shi B, Liu Z, Zhu Z . How to rectify the convex coronal imbalance in patients with unstable dystrophic scoliosis secondary to type I neurofibromatosis: experience from a case series. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):368. PMC: 9020035. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05321-w. View