Commentary on "Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Last 10 Years: A Narrative Review"
Overview
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Charles Y, Cazzato R, Nachabe R, Chatterjea A, Steib J, Gangi A
. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement. Clin Spine Surg. 2021; 34(7):E415-E424.
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001132.
View
2.
Rush 3rd A, Shepard N, Nolte M, Siemionow K, Phillips F
. Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: Current State of the Art. Int J Spine Surg. 2022; 16(S2):S22-S27.
PMC: 9808789.
DOI: 10.14444/8273.
View
3.
Kim C, Easley K, Lee J, Hong J, Virk M, Hsieh P
. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion. Global Spine J. 2020; 10(2 Suppl):143S-150S.
PMC: 7263326.
DOI: 10.1177/2192568219882344.
View
4.
Liu G, Liu S, Zuo Y, Li Q, Wu Z, Wu N
. Recent Advances in Technique and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in Adult Scoliosis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017; 130(21):2608-2615.
PMC: 5678262.
DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.212688.
View
5.
Clark A, Ziewacz J, Safaee M, Lau D, Lyon R, Chou D
. Intraoperative neuromonitoring with MEPs and prediction of postoperative neurological deficits in patients undergoing surgery for cervical and cervicothoracic myelopathy. Neurosurg Focus. 2013; 35(1):E7.
DOI: 10.3171/2013.4.FOCUS13121.
View