» Articles » PMID: 39362764

Best Patient Care Practices for Administering PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy

Overview
Journal J Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2024 Oct 3
PMID 39362764
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Optimal patient management protocols for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are poorly defined and even further complexified with new therapy approvals, such as radiopharmaceuticals. The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted agent Lu vipivotide tetraxetan ([Lu]Lu-PSMA-617), approved after the phase III VISION study, presents physicians with additional aspects of patient management, including specific adverse event (AE) monitoring and management, as well as radiation safety. Drawing on our experience as VISION study investigators, here we provide guidance on best practices for delivering PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) to patients with mCRPC. After a comprehensive review of published evidence and guidelines on RPT management in prostate cancer, we identified educational gaps in managing the radiation safety and AEs associated with [Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Our results showed that providing sufficient education on AEs (e.g., fatigue and dry mouth) and radiation safety principles is key to effective delivery and management of patient expectations. Patient counseling by health care professionals, across disciplines, is a cornerstone of optimal patient management during PSMA-targeted RPT. Multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial, and physicians must adhere to radiation safety protocols and counsel patients on radiation safety considerations. Treatment with [Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is generally well tolerated; however, additional interventions may be required, such as dosing modification, medications, or transfusions. Urinary incontinence can be challenging in the context of radiation safety. Multidisciplinary collaboration between medical oncologists and nuclear medicine teams ensures that patients are monitored and managed safely and efficiently. In clinical practice, the benefit-to-risk ratio should always be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

References
1.
Minton O, Richardson A, Sharpe M, Hotopf M, Stone P . A systematic review and meta-analysis of the pharmacological treatment of cancer-related fatigue. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100(16):1155-66. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn250. View

2.
Daugherty M, Chelluri R, Bratslavsky G, Byler T . Are we underestimating the rates of incontinence after prostate cancer treatment? Results from NHANES. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017; 49(10):1715-1721. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1660-5. View

3.
Sjogreen Gleisner K, Brolin G, Sundlov A, Mjekiqi E, Ostlund K, Tennvall J . Long-Term Retention of 177Lu/177mLu-DOTATATE in Patients Investigated by γ-Spectrometry and γ-Camera Imaging. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(7):976-84. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.155390. View

4.
Calais J, Czernin J, Thin P, Gartmann J, Nguyen K, Armstrong W . Safety of PSMA-Targeted Molecular Radioligand Therapy with Lu-PSMA-617: Results from the Prospective Multicenter Phase 2 Trial RESIST-PC (NCT03042312). J Nucl Med. 2021; 62(10):1447-1456. PMC: 8724902. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262543. View

5.
de Bakker M, Dominicus N, Meeuwis A, Janssen M, Konijnenberg M, Nagarajah J . Urinary excretion kinetics of [Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 50(12):3572-3575. PMC: 10547615. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06328-8. View