» Articles » PMID: 39359710

The Neuromuscular Portal and Match: Working Toward a More Fair, Equitable, and Transparent Process

Abstract

Prior to 2021, the neuromuscular medicine fellowship application process suffered from non-standardized timelines and substantial variability. To rectify this, the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) established a standardized application timeline and an online application portal in 2020-2021, followed by the introduction of a partial match process. In 2021-2022, AANEM launched a traditional, binding, two-way match system for fellowship positions allocation based on the Gale-Shapley stable matching algorithm. Surveys assessing perceptions of fairness in the application portal and match process were dispatched to applicants and program directors following the 2021 and 2022 recruitment cycles. In the 2020-21 cycle, 90% of program directors and 95% of applicants affirmed the standardized timeline benefited applicants. However, 57% of applicants deemed the process as unfair. All programs and most applicants (58%) favored a transition to a two-way match. The implementation of the two-way match in 2021-22 attracted participation from 97% of programs, with 80% of applicants and 95% of programs viewing the process as fair to applicants. A significant majority of both applicants (86%) and programs (94%) supported maintaining the standardized timeline and two-way match. We advocate for the universal adoption of the AANEM Match for neuromuscular fellowship recruitment and a standardized fellowship application timeline across all neurologic specialties to promote transparency, fairness, and equity for applicants.

Citing Articles

Missing Full Disclosures.

Neurol Educ. 2025; 4(1):e200172.

PMID: 39744619 PMC: 11688123. DOI: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200172.

References
1.
Karakis I, Liu L, Bensalem-Owen M, LaRoche S, Lopez J, Schmitt S . Clinical Neurophysiology Fellowship Program Directors Survey on a Standardized Fellowship Match Process: A Call for Action. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2021; 39(7):561-566. DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000852. View

2.
Monir R, Michaudet K, Monir J, Rahmanian K, Michaudet C, Cooper L . Impact of Match Violations on Applicants' Perceptions and Rankings of Residency Programs. Cureus. 2021; 13(1):e12823. PMC: 7895534. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12823. View

3.
London Z, Mahajan A, Cahill C, Khan J, Schuyler E, Price R . The Neurology Fellowship Application Conundrum: Finding Common Ground. Neurology. 2022; 98(22):929-937. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200717. View

4.
Angus S, Adams M, Willett L, Swenson S, Chaudhry S, Halvorsen A . The new internal medicine fellowship match timeline: a change in the right direction. Am J Med. 2014; 127(11):1132-1136. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.07.017. View

5.
London Z, Gable K, Govindarajan R, Guidon A, Gwathmey K, Hehir M . The neuromuscular fellowship portal and match. Muscle Nerve. 2022; 65(6):640-645. PMC: 9314681. DOI: 10.1002/mus.27525. View