» Articles » PMID: 39359488

Ethical and Psychological Considerations for Posthumous-Assisted Reproduction for Adolescents and Young Adults With Poor Cancer Prognosis in the Context of Grief

Overview
Date 2024 Oct 3
PMID 39359488
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Families or loved ones of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with a poor cancer prognosis who preserved fertility and did not survive treatment may choose to pursue posthumous assisted reproduction (PAR; i.e., use of preserved reproductive material for future family-building attempts). Decisions about PAR may be occurring in the context of grief and bereavement, which is associated with ethical and psychological considerations because grief can complicate a person's capacity for informed decision-making.

Methods: Through the use of a five-step ethical decision-making model, the American Psychological Association's Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, and a blended case example, the ethical and psychological considerations for families of AYA with poor prognosis who pursue PAR is discussed with an ethical analysis.

Results: Ethical and psychological considerations included assessing the potential for harm to involved parties, navigating PAR decision-making with responsibility and honesty, examining the accessibility of PAR, and considering informed consent/assent and autonomy.

Conclusions: Clinical recommendations for supporting families and loved ones exploring PAR in the context of grief were discussed, with considerations for improving clinicians' comfort and competence with PAR, incorporating grief into informed consent conversations, standardizing conversations about PAR, and promoting an interdisciplinary approach to PAR-related decisions.

References
1.
Stroebe M, Schut H . The dual process model of coping with bereavement: a decade on. Omega (Westport). 2010; 61(4):273-89. DOI: 10.2190/OM.61.4.b. View

2.
Bokek-Cohen Y, Ravitsky V . Parent-initiated posthumous-assisted reproduction revisited in light of the interest in genetic origins. J Med Ethics. 2022; 49(5):357-360. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2022-108204. View

3.
Vadaparampil S, Gwede C, Meade C, Kelvin J, Reich R, Reinecke J . ENRICH: A promising oncology nurse training program to implement ASCO clinical practice guidelines on fertility for AYA cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2016; 99(11):1907-1910. PMC: 5069115. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.013. View

4.
Pennings G, De Wert G, Shenfield F, Cohen J, Devroey P, Tarlatzis B . ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 11: Posthumous assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21(12):3050-3. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del287. View

5.
Oktay K, Harvey B, Partridge A, Quinn G, Reinecke J, Taylor H . Fertility Preservation in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(19):1994-2001. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.1914. View