» Articles » PMID: 39358519

A Drosophila Computational Brain Model Reveals Sensorimotor Processing

Abstract

The recent assembly of the adult Drosophila melanogaster central brain connectome, containing more than 125,000 neurons and 50 million synaptic connections, provides a template for examining sensory processing throughout the brain. Here we create a leaky integrate-and-fire computational model of the entire Drosophila brain, on the basis of neural connectivity and neurotransmitter identity, to study circuit properties of feeding and grooming behaviours. We show that activation of sugar-sensing or water-sensing gustatory neurons in the computational model accurately predicts neurons that respond to tastes and are required for feeding initiation. In addition, using the model to activate neurons in the feeding region of the Drosophila brain predicts those that elicit motor neuron firing-a testable hypothesis that we validate by optogenetic activation and behavioural studies. Activating different classes of gustatory neurons in the model makes accurate predictions of how several taste modalities interact, providing circuit-level insight into aversive and appetitive taste processing. Additionally, we applied this model to mechanosensory circuits and found that computational activation of mechanosensory neurons predicts activation of a small set of neurons comprising the antennal grooming circuit, and accurately describes the circuit response upon activation of different mechanosensory subtypes. Our results demonstrate that modelling brain circuits using only synapse-level connectivity and predicted neurotransmitter identity generates experimentally testable hypotheses and can describe complete sensorimotor transformations.

Citing Articles

Connectomic analysis of taste circuits in Drosophila.

Walker S, Pena-Garcia M, Devineni A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5278.

PMID: 39939650 PMC: 11821855. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89088-9.


The VAPB Axis Precisely Coordinates the Timing of Motoneuron Dendritogenesis in Neural Map Development.

Kamiyama D, Nishida Y, Kamiyama R, Sego A, Vining G, Bui K Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 39801516 PMC: 11722539. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5684747/v1.


Disentangling how the brain is wired.

Sprecher S Fly (Austin). 2024; 19(1):2440950.

PMID: 39737740 PMC: 11702924. DOI: 10.1080/19336934.2024.2440950.

References
1.
Eckstein N, Bates A, Champion A, Du M, Yin Y, Schlegel P . Neurotransmitter classification from electron microscopy images at synaptic sites in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 2024; 187(10):2574-2594.e23. PMC: 11106717. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.016. View

2.
Shiu P, Sterne G, Engert S, Dickson B, Scott K . Taste quality and hunger interactions in a feeding sensorimotor circuit. Elife. 2022; 11. PMC: 9292995. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.79887. View

3.
Gordon M, Scott K . Motor control in a Drosophila taste circuit. Neuron. 2009; 61(3):373-84. PMC: 2650400. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.033. View

4.
Seeds A, Ravbar P, Chung P, Hampel S, Midgley Jr F, Mensh B . A suppression hierarchy among competing motor programs drives sequential grooming in Drosophila. Elife. 2014; 3:e02951. PMC: 4136539. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.02951. View

5.
Hampel S, Eichler K, Yamada D, Bock D, Kamikouchi A, Seeds A . Distinct subpopulations of mechanosensory chordotonal organ neurons elicit grooming of the fruit fly antennae. Elife. 2020; 9. PMC: 7652415. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.59976. View