» Articles » PMID: 39354620

The Feasibility and Acceptability of Using EMA and Physiological Data to Measure Day-to-day Occupational Stress, Musculoskeletal Pain and Mental Health

Overview
Journal BMC Res Notes
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 Oct 1
PMID 39354620
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of using EMA questionnaires and physiological data via wristbands to measure day-to-day occupational stress, musculoskeletal pain, and mental health among university employees (N = 23), across 10 work days. Adherence to the study protocol as well as participant experiences (via semi-structured interviews) with the protocol were used to assess feasibility and acceptability of the method.

Results: Adherence to the study protocol was excellent. Participants wore the wristband for a mean of 9.7 days. Participants completed a mean of 24.5 EMAs (out of 30). Semi-structured interviews with participants revealed that a small number of participants had difficulties uploading data from the wristband. The timing of EMAs was challenging for some participants, resulting in missed EMAs, raising questions about whether EMA frequency and timing could be changed to improve adherence. Some EMA items were difficult to answer due to the nature of participants' roles and the work undertaken. Overall, the protocol was feasible and acceptable but highlighted future potential changes including using a different physiological data collection tool, reducing the number of EMAs, adjusting EMA timings, and reviewing EMA items.

References
1.
Bolliger L, Lukan J, Lustrek M, De Bacquer D, Clays E . Protocol of the STRess at Work (STRAW) Project: How to Disentangle Day-to-Day Occupational Stress among Academics Based on EMA, Physiological Data, and Smartphone Sensor and Usage Data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 17(23). PMC: 7730921. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17238835. View

2.
de Zambotti M, Goldstone A, Claudatos S, Colrain I, Baker F . A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2™ compared with polysomnography in adults. Chronobiol Int. 2017; 35(4):465-476. DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2017.1413578. View

3.
Corino V, Laureanti R, Ferranti L, Scarpini G, Lombardi F, Mainardi L . Detection of atrial fibrillation episodes using a wristband device. Physiol Meas. 2017; 38(5):787-799. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aa5dd7. View

4.
de Looff P, Noordzij M, Moerbeek M, Nijman H, Didden R, Embregts P . Changes in heart rate and skin conductance in the 30 min preceding aggressive behavior. Psychophysiology. 2019; 56(10):e13420. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13420. View

5.
Bolliger L, Debra G, Lukan J, Peeters R, Colman E, Baele E . The association between day-to-day stress experiences and work-life interference among office workers in academia: an ecological momentary assessment study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022; 96(2):201-212. PMC: 9474273. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-022-01915-y. View