» Articles » PMID: 39352188

Polygenic Risk Scores: The Next Step for Improved Risk Stratification in Coronary Artery Disease?

Overview
Date 2024 Oct 1
PMID 39352188
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite significant advances in the management of coronary artery disease (CAD) and reductions in annual mortality rates in recent decades, this disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Consequently, there is an ongoing need for efforts to address this situation. Current clinical algorithms to identify at-risk patients are particularly inaccurate in moderate-risk individuals. For this reason, the need for ancillary tests has been suggested, including predictive genetic screening. As genetic studies rapidly expand and genomic data becomes more accessible, numerous genetic risk scores have been proposed to identify and evaluate an individual's susceptibility to developing diseases, including CAD. The field of genetics has indeed made substantial contributions to risk prediction, particularly in cases where children have parents with premature CAD, resulting in an increased risk of up to 75%. The polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have emerged as a potentially valuable tool for understanding and stratifying an individual's genetic risk. The PRS is calculated as a weighted sum of single-nucleotide variants present throughout the human genome, identifiable through genome-wide association studies, and associated with various cardiometabolic diseases. The use of PRSs holds promise, as it enables the development of personalized strategies for preventing or diagnosing specific pathologies early. Furthermore, it can complement existing clinical scores, increasing the accuracy of individual risk prediction. Consequently, the application of PRSs has the potential to impact the costs and adverse outcomes associated with CAD positively. This narrative review provides an overview of the role of PRSs in the context of CAD.

References
1.
Slunecka J, van der Zee M, Beck J, Johnson B, Finnicum C, Pool R . Implementation and implications for polygenic risk scores in healthcare. Hum Genomics. 2021; 15(1):46. PMC: 8290135. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-021-00339-y. View

2.
Marston N, Pirruccello J, Melloni G, Koyama S, Kamanu F, Weng L . Predictive Utility of a Coronary Artery Disease Polygenic Risk Score in Primary Prevention. JAMA Cardiol. 2022; 8(2):130-137. PMC: 9857431. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.4466. View

3.
Chen Y, Chen S, Han Y, Xu Q, Zhao X . Elevated ApoB/apoA-1 is Associated with in-Hospital Mortality in Elderly Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023; 16:3501-3512. PMC: 10629450. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S433876. View

4.
Cole J, Zubiran R, Wolska A, Jialal I, Remaley A . Use of Apolipoprotein B in the Era of Precision Medicine: Time for a Paradigm Change?. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(17). PMC: 10488498. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175737. View

5.
Zheng Z, Liu S, Sidorenko J, Wang Y, Lin T, Yengo L . Leveraging functional genomic annotations and genome coverage to improve polygenic prediction of complex traits within and between ancestries. Nat Genet. 2024; 56(5):767-777. PMC: 11096109. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01704-y. View