» Articles » PMID: 39351323

Local and Systemic Peptide Therapies for Soft Tissue Regeneration: A Narrative Review

Overview
Journal Yale J Biol Med
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Oct 1
PMID 39351323
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: The musculoskeletal system, due to inherent structure and function, lends itself to contributing toward joint pain, whether from inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis, degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis, or trauma causing soft tissue injury. Administration of peptides for treatment of joint pain or inflammation is an emerging line of therapy that seeks to offer therapeutic benefits while remaining safe and relatively non-invasive. : The purpose of this study is to review the current literature on existing oral peptide agents, intra-articular peptide agents, and new developments in human trials to assess route of administration (RoA) for drug delivery in terms of soft tissue regeneration. : Narrative Review. : A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed database. The search included medical subject headings (MeSH) terms related to peptide therapy, soft tissue regeneration, and RoA. Inclusion criteria comprised articles focusing on the mechanisms of action of peptides, clinical or biochemical outcomes, and review articles. Exclusion criteria included insufficient literature or studies not meeting the set evidence level. : The review identified various peptides demonstrating efficacy in soft tissue repair. Oral and intra-articular peptides showed distinct advantages in soft tissue regeneration, with intra-articular routes providing localized effects and oral routes offering systemic benefits. However, both routes have limitations in bioavailability and absorption. Still in their infancy, further inquiries/research into the properties and efficacy of emerging peptides will be necessary before widespread use. As a viable alternative prior to surgical intervention, peptide treatments present as promising candidates for positive outcomes in soft tissue regeneration.

References
1.
Ramadass S, Perumal S, Gopinath A, Nisal A, Subramanian S, Madhan B . Sol-gel assisted fabrication of collagen hydrolysate composite scaffold: a novel therapeutic alternative to the traditional collagen scaffold. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014; 6(17):15015-25. DOI: 10.1021/am502948g. View

2.
Khatri M, Naughton R, Clifford T, Harper L, Corr L . The effects of collagen peptide supplementation on body composition, collagen synthesis, and recovery from joint injury and exercise: a systematic review. Amino Acids. 2021; 53(10):1493-1506. PMC: 8521576. DOI: 10.1007/s00726-021-03072-x. View

3.
Cavasin M . Therapeutic potential of thymosin-beta4 and its derivative N-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline (Ac-SDKP) in cardiac healing after infarction. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2006; 6(5):305-11. DOI: 10.2165/00129784-200606050-00003. View

4.
Park K, Park M, Cho M, Kwok S, Ju J, Ko H . Type II collagen oral tolerance; mechanism and role in collagen-induced arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2009; 19(6):581-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10165-009-0210-0. View

5.
Hong G, Min S, Jo Y . Anti-Oxidative and Anti-Aging Activities of Porcine By-Product Collagen Hydrolysates Produced by Commercial Proteases: Effect of Hydrolysis and Ultrafiltration. Molecules. 2019; 24(6). PMC: 6472052. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24061104. View