» Articles » PMID: 39351278

One-Year Prognosis Difference of Myocardial Infarction With or Without Coronary Obstruction in Developing Countries: Insights From the Moroccan Experience

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The debate remains open as to the difference in prevalence of mortality and occurrence of acute events in patients with Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) and others with Myocardial infarction with coronary arteries disease (MI-CAD).

Methods: We conducted a 2-year retrospective study for patients admitted for Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to analyze the clinical and prognostic characteristics of patients with MINOCA versus MI-CAD. We defined 1-year all-cause mortality as the primary outcome, and the secondary outcome as a composite of 1-year readmission for myocardial infarction or acute heart failure (AHF).

Results: Our study included 1077 patients, 95.3% with MI-CAD and 4.7% with MINOCA. At admission, 71.1% patient were diagnosed STEMI and 28.9% with NSTEMI. The difference between the 2 groups was found on age ( < .001), hypertension, diabetes with consecutive -values of .007 and .001, as well as Ejection fraction ( < .001). For the outcomes studied, the difference was significant between the 2 groups for all events, and MINOCA patients had a better prognosis than MI-CAD patients, with adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for 1-year mortality (HR = 0.601  = .004), for readmission for ACS (HR = 0.662;  = .002) and for readmission for AHF (HR = 0.539;  = .019).

Conclusion: Despite the ambiguity in the genesis of MINOCA, the short- and long-term prognosis of these patients remains generally favorable.

References
1.
Tokarek T, Dziewierz A, Plens K, Rakowski T, Dudek D, Siudak Z . Radial approach reduces mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2021; 131(5):421-428. DOI: 10.20452/pamw.15886. View

2.
Alkhalil M, De Maria G, Akbar N, Ruparelia N, Choudhury R . Prospects for Precision Medicine in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Patient-Level Insights into Myocardial Injury and Repair. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(14). PMC: 10380764. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144668. View

3.
Bouchlarhem A, Bouyadid S, Bazid Z, Ismaili N, Ouafi N . Effectiveness of Primary Coronary Intervention for Patients With Delayed ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights from Moroccan Cardiology Intensive Care Units. Am J Cardiol. 2024; 216:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.12.033. View

4.
Pasupathy S, Air T, Dreyer R, Tavella R, Beltrame J . Systematic review of patients presenting with suspected myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary arteries. Circulation. 2015; 131(10):861-70. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011201. View

5.
Mileva N, Paolisso P, Gallinoro E, Fabbricatore D, Munhoz D, Bergamaschi L . Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in MINOCA: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023; 16(3):376-389. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.12.029. View