» Articles » PMID: 39350210

Access to Healthcare Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Cross-sectional Analysis of Income and User-access Across 16 Economically Diverse Countries

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Oct 1
PMID 39350210
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: National health systems have different strengths and resilience levels. During the COVID-19 pandemic, resources often had to be reallocated and this impacted the availability of healthcare services in many countries. To date there have been few quantitative contemporary studies of inequalities in access to healthcare within and between countries. In this study, we aim to compare inequality within and between 16 economically diverse countries.

Methods: Online surveys were conducted on 22 150 adults in 16 countries across six continents in 2022. Quota sampling and post-stratification weighting was used to obtain an age, gender, geographically, and educationally representative sample. The study assesses the differences in challenges in access to healthcare during the pandemic (for GP, surgical/clinical and digital GP services) using country-specific expanded health-needs-adjusted Erreygers' concentration indices and compares these values between countries using a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

Results: Results show wide variation in income-related challenges in access within countries for different types of care. For example, Erreygers' concentration index for digital services in Colombia exhibited highly regressive inequality at 0·17, compared to Japan with an index of -0·15. Inequalities between countries were also evident, with Spearman rank coefficients of -0·69 and -0·65 (p-values of 0·003 and 0·006) for digital and surgical access, indicating that lower income countries had greater inequality in healthcare access challenges.

Conclusion: During the pandemic, inequalities in challenges to accessing healthcare were greatest in low and middle-income countries. Digital technologies offer a reasonable means to address some of this inequality if adequate support is provided and accessible digital infrastructure exists.

References
1.
Zhuoga C, Cuomu Z, Li S, Dou L, Li C, Dawa Z . Income-related equity in inpatient care utilization and unmet needs between 2013 and 2018 in Tibet, China. Int J Equity Health. 2023; 22(1):85. PMC: 10173530. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01889-4. View

2.
Barasa E, Kazungu J, Nguhiu P, Ravishankar N . Examining the level and inequality in health insurance coverage in 36 sub-Saharan African countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2021; 6(4). PMC: 8076950. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004712. View

3.
Miyawaki A, Tabuchi T, Ong M, Tsugawa Y . Age and Social Disparities in the Use of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan: Cross-sectional Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(7):e27982. PMC: 8315162. DOI: 10.2196/27982. View

4.
Harris E . WHO Declares End of COVID-19 Global Health Emergency. JAMA. 2023; 329(21):1817. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.8656. View

5.
Duch R, Asiedu E, Nakamura R, Rouyard T, Mayol A, Barnett A . Financial incentives for COVID-19 vaccines in a rural low-resource setting: a cluster-randomized trial. Nat Med. 2023; 29(12):3193-3202. PMC: 10719106. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02670-4. View