» Articles » PMID: 39349815

Effects of Artificial Intelligence Implementation on Efficiency in Medical Imaging-a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal NPJ Digit Med
Date 2024 Sep 30
PMID 39349815
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In healthcare, integration of artificial intelligence (AI) holds strong promise for facilitating clinicians' work, especially in clinical imaging. We aimed to assess the impact of AI implementation for medical imaging on efficiency in real-world clinical workflows and conducted a systematic review searching six medical databases. Two reviewers double-screened all records. Eligible records were evaluated for methodological quality. The outcomes of interest were workflow adaptation due to AI implementation, changes in time for tasks, and clinician workload. After screening 13,756 records, we identified 48 original studies to be incuded in the review. Thirty-three studies measured time for tasks, with 67% reporting reductions. Yet, three separate meta-analyses of 12 studies did not show significant effects after AI implementation. We identified five different workflows adapting to AI use. Most commonly, AI served as a secondary reader for detection tasks. Alternatively, AI was used as the primary reader for identifying positive cases, resulting in reorganizing worklists or issuing alerts. Only three studies scrutinized workload calculations based on the time saved through AI use. This systematic review and meta-analysis represents an assessment of the efficiency improvements offered by AI applications in real-world clinical imaging, predominantly revealing enhancements across the studies. However, considerable heterogeneity in available studies renders robust inferences regarding overall effectiveness in imaging tasks. Further work is needed on standardized reporting, evaluation of system integration, and real-world data collection to better understand the technological advances of AI in real-world healthcare workflows. Systematic review registration: Prospero ID CRD42022303439, International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/40485.

Citing Articles

Streamlit Application and Deep Learning Model for Brain Metastasis Monitoring After Gamma Knife Treatment.

Buga R, Buzea C, Agop M, Ochiuz L, Vasincu D, Popa O Biomedicines. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40002836 PMC: 11852629. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13020423.

References
1.
Lopez Torres E, Fiorina E, Pennazio F, Peroni C, Saletta M, Camarlinghi N . Large scale validation of the M5L lung CAD on heterogeneous CT datasets. Med Phys. 2015; 42(4):1477-89. PMC: 5148101. DOI: 10.1118/1.4907970. View

2.
Ahmad Z, Rahim S, Zubair M, Abdul-Ghafar J . Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, current applications and future role with special emphasis on its potential and promise in pathology: present and future impact, obstacles including costs and acceptance among pathologists, practical and.... Diagn Pathol. 2021; 16(1):24. PMC: 7971952. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-021-01085-4. View

3.
Fujita H . AI-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD): the latest review to read first. Radiol Phys Technol. 2020; 13(1):6-19. DOI: 10.1007/s12194-019-00552-4. View

4.
Sun J, Peng L, Li T, Adila D, Zaiman Z, Melton-Meaux G . Performance of a Chest Radiograph AI Diagnostic Tool for COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study. Radiol Artif Intell. 2022; 4(4):e210217. PMC: 9344211. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.210217. View

5.
Park C, Seo S, Kang N, Ko B, Choi B, Park C . Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Current Applications and Issues. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(42):e379. PMC: 7606883. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e379. View