» Articles » PMID: 39347095

Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Bioactive Potential of Well-Root PT by Comparison with ProRoot MTA and Biodentine

Overview
Journal J Dent Sci
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Sep 30
PMID 39347095
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/purpose: Well-Root PT is a novel bioceramic material developed to overcome limitations of conventional calcium silicate cements. The purpose of this study was to assess the biocompatibility and bioactivity of a premixed putty-type cement, Well-Root PT.

Materials And Methods: Identical cylindrical samples were prepared from ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and Well-Root PT. calcium weight volume and calcium ion release from the materials were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy. An rat direct pulp capping model was implemented with the materials ( = 14 per material). The rats were sacrificed at 7 or 28 days. Hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical analyses were performed.

Results: calcium weight volume was 42.83 ± 8.82 % in ProRoot MTA, 47.05 ± 8.83 % in Biodentine, and 29.99 ± 4.94 % in Well-Root PT. Calcium ion releases from Well-Root PT after 7 and 28 days were similar with those from ProRoot MTA, but lower than those from Biodentine ( = 0.001 after 7 and 28 days equally). In an rat model, hematoxylin and eosin analysis showed no significant differences in inflammatory infiltration ( = 0.393) and hard tissue formation scores among the materials ( = 0.905). Also, both CD68 and DSPP expression showed similar results, with no significant differences among the materials (equally  = 0.874 for both markers).

Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, Well-Root PT was comparable to ProRoot MTA and Biodentine in terms of biocompatibility and bioactivity.

References
1.
Natale L, Rodrigues M, Xavier T, Simoes A, de Souza D, Braga R . Ion release and mechanical properties of calcium silicate and calcium hydroxide materials used for pulp capping. Int Endod J. 2014; 48(1):89-94. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12281. View

2.
Klinge U, Dievernich A, Tolba R, Klosterhalfen B, Davies L . CD68+ macrophages as crucial components of the foreign body reaction demonstrate an unconventional pattern of functional markers quantified by analysis with double fluorescence staining. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020; 108(8):3134-3146. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34639. View

3.
Fleming G, Farooq A, Barralet J . Influence of powder/liquid mixing ratio on the performance of a restorative glass-ionomer dental cement. Biomaterials. 2003; 24(23):4173-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00301-6. View

4.
Pires M, Cordeiro J, Vasconcelos I, Alves M, Quaresma S, Ginjeira A . Effect of different manipulations on the physical, chemical and microstructural characteristics of Biodentine. Dent Mater. 2021; 37(7):e399-e406. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.03.021. View

5.
Park S, Ye J, Asiri N, Chae Y, Choi S, Nam O . Biocompatibility and Bioactivity of a Dual-Cured Resin-Based Calcium Silicate Cement: In Vitro and in vivo Evaluation. J Endod. 2023; 50(2):235-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.11.009. View