» Articles » PMID: 39347094

Incremental Net Benefit of Extending Human Papillomavirus Vaccine to Boys in Oropharyngeal Cancer Burden: Meta-analysis of Cost-effectiveness Studies

Overview
Journal J Dent Sci
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Sep 30
PMID 39347094
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/purpose: The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is increasing worldwide. HPV vaccines have shown efficacy in preventing diseases in both males and females. Therefore, there is a need to develop cost-effective strategies for HPV vaccines to prevent HPV-related OPC. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate cost-effectiveness using the global mean of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios compared to the willingness-to-pay threshold and incremental net benefits (INBs) of HPV vaccination strategies between boys' extension vaccine and girls only. These recommendations will be useful for countries that have not implemented universal HPV vaccines in national programs, such as Taiwan.

Materials And Methods: Studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination strategies in the prevention of OPC that included both sexes versus girls only were identified through the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases on February 05, 2024, and a meta-analysis of pooled INBs was performed using a random-effects model. The outcome was an effective measurement of the OPC burden. The results are represented in USD (2024).

Results: Fifteen model analyses were included. All the studies were conducted in high-income countries. The global mean of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $39,553 (95% CI, $27,008-66,641) per quality-adjusted life years gained, which was below the global mean of the willingness-to-pay threshold of $65,473 (95% CI, $52,138-83,755). Pooled INBs of $9370 (95% CI, $5046-13,695;  < 0.001) favored the extended HPV in boys.

Conclusion: HPV vaccination strategies that include boys are cost-effective compared to those with girls only in preventing OPC burden. By implementing a universal HPV vaccination program, countries can receive $9370 in additional monetary benefits per patient. Given its relevance to high-income countries, this study offers key insights that can aid policymakers in Taiwan.

References
1.
Bagepally B, Chaikledkaew U, Chaiyakunapruk N, Attia J, Thakkinstian A . Meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):202. PMC: 8845252. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07595-1. View

2.
Simons J, Vida N, Westra T, Postma M . Cost-effectiveness analysis of a gender-neutral human papillomavirus vaccination program in the Netherlands. Vaccine. 2020; 38(30):4687-4694. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.031. View

3.
Fonseca T, Jural L, Maranon-Vasquez G, Magno M, Roza A, Ferreira D . Global prevalence of human papillomavirus-related oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 28(1):62. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05425-0. View

4.
Ng S, Hutubessy R, Chaiyakunapruk N . Systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination: 9-Valent vaccine, gender-neutral and multiple age cohort vaccination. Vaccine. 2018; 36(19):2529-2544. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.03.024. View

5.
Palmer C, Tobe K, Negishi Y, You X, Chen Y, Abe M . Health impact and cost effectiveness of implementing gender-neutral HPV vaccination in Japan. J Med Econ. 2023; 26(1):1546-1554. DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2282912. View