A Randomized Pragmatic Feasibility Trial to Promote Student Perspective-taking on Client Physical Activity Level: a Collaborative Project

Overview

Journal Pilot Feasibility Stud

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2024 Sep 28

PMID 39342378

Authors

Lisa B Hoplock

Michelle M Lobchuk

Shaelyn M Strachan

Gayle Halas

Cheryl Olfert

Sandra Webber

Joanne L Parsons

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Health-care practitioners have opportunities to talk with clients about unhealthy behaviors. How practitioners approach these conversations involves skill to be effective. Thus, teaching health-care students to communicate empathetically with clients should promote effective client-practitioner conversations about health behavior change. The primary objective of this pilot trial was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of a theoretically informed intervention designed to improve perspective-taking.

Methods: For inclusion in this randomized mixed-methods parallel two-arm trial, participants needed to be a student at the investigators' Canadian university and have completed course content on behavior change communication. Using a 1:1 allocation ratio, participants in Respiratory, Physical, and Occupational Therapy; Nurse Practitioner; and Kinesiology programs were randomly assigned to full or partial intervention conditions. Full intervention participants completed a perspective-taking workshop and practiced perspective-taking prior to an in-lab dialogue with a client-actor (masked to condition) about physical activity. Partial intervention participants received the workshop after the dialogue. We assessed feasibility and appropriateness by comparing recruitment rates, protocol, and psychometric outcomes to criteria. We assessed acceptability (secondary outcome) by analyzing exit interviews.

Results: We screened and randomized 163 participants (82 = full intervention; 81 = partial intervention). We fell slightly short of our recruitment success criteria (10-15 participants per program) when 2/50 Occupational Therapy students participated. We met some but not all of our protocol criteria: Some full intervention participants did not practice perspective-taking before the dialogue, because they did not see anyone during the practice period or did not have a practice opportunity. Psychometric outcomes met the criteria, except for one measure that demonstrated ceiling effects and low reliability (Cronbach's alpha < .70). There were no adverse events related to participation.

Conclusions: The intervention should be largely feasible, appropriate, and acceptable to deliver. We suggest changes that are large enough to warrant conducting another pilot study. We outline recommended improvements that are applicable to researchers and educators interested in recruitment, adherence to home practice, and online uptake of the intervention.

Trial Registration: This trial was registered retrospectively on November 8, 2023, at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06123507 .

References

Cunico L, Sartori R, Marognolli O, Meneghini A . Developing empathy in nursing students: a cohort longitudinal study. J Clin Nurs. 2012; 21(13-14):2016-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04105.x. View

Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios L . A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:1. PMC: 2824145. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1. View

Juve-Udina M, Zuriguel Perez E, Fabrellas Padres N, Samartino M, Garcia M, Castella Creus M . Basic nursing care: retrospective evaluation of communication and psychosocial interventions documented by nurses in the acute care setting. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2013; 46(1):65-72. DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12062. View

Blatt B, LeLacheur S, Galinsky A, Simmens S, Greenberg L . Does perspective-taking increase patient satisfaction in medical encounters?. Acad Med. 2010; 85(9):1445-52. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eae5ec. View

Lobchuk M, Halas G, West C, Harder N, Tursunova Z, Ramraj C . Development of a novel empathy-related video-feedback intervention to improve empathic accuracy of nursing students: A pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2016; 46:86-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.034. View

van Berkhout E, Malouff J . The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Couns Psychol. 2015; 63(1):32-41. DOI: 10.1037/cou0000093. View

Gerdes K, Segal E . Importance of empathy for social work practice: integrating new science. Soc Work. 2011; 56(2):141-8. DOI: 10.1093/sw/56.2.141. View

Levesque C, Williams G, Elliot D, Pickering M, Bodenhamer B, Finley P . Validating the theoretical structure of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) across three different health behaviors. Health Educ Res. 2006; 22(5):691-702. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyl148. View

Drwecki B, Moore C, Ward S, Prkachin K . Reducing racial disparities in pain treatment: the role of empathy and perspective-taking. Pain. 2011; 152(5):1001-1006. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.005. View

10.

Bach A, Bethishou L, Beuttler R, Fakourfar N, Rao H . Comparison of Virtual Simulations with Peers versus Actors as Standardized Patients on Virtual OSCE Scores. Am J Pharm Educ. 2023; 87(5):100028. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2022.11.004. View

11.

Mercer S, Neumann M, Wirtz M, Fitzpatrick B, Vojt G . General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland--a pilot prospective study using structural equation modeling. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 73(2):240-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.022. View

12.

Lobchuk M, Hoplock L, Halas G, West C, Dika C, Schroeder W . : A randomized, controlled pilot study to promote nursing student perspective-taking on carers' health risk behaviors. BMC Nurs. 2018; 17:21. PMC: 5968556. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-018-0291-1. View

13.

Jansink R, Braspenning J, van der Weijden T, Elwyn G, Grol R . Primary care nurses struggle with lifestyle counseling in diabetes care: a qualitative analysis. BMC Fam Pract. 2010; 11:41. PMC: 2889883. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-41. View

14.

Kim S, Kaplowitz S, Johnston M . The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Eval Health Prof. 2004; 27(3):237-51. DOI: 10.1177/0163278704267037. View

15.

Lelorain S, Bredart A, Dolbeault S, Sultan S . A systematic review of the associations between empathy measures and patient outcomes in cancer care. Psychooncology. 2012; 21(12):1255-64. DOI: 10.1002/pon.2115. View

16.

Lerman C, Daly M, Sands C, Balshem A, Lustbader E, Heggan T . Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85(13):1074-80. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/85.13.1074. View

17.

WATSON D, Clark L, Tellegen A . Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(6):1063-70. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. View

18.

Lobchuk M, McClement S, McPherson C, Cheang M . Impact of patient smoking behavior on empathic helping by family caregivers in lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012; 39(2):E112-21. DOI: 10.1188/12.ONF.E112-E121. View

19.

Keyworth C, Peters S, Chisholm A, Hart J . Nursing students' perceptions of obesity and behaviour change: implications for undergraduate nurse education. Nurse Educ Today. 2012; 33(5):481-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.016. View

20.

Hoplock L, Lobchuk M . Are perspective-taking outcomes always positive? Challenges and mitigation strategies. Nurs Forum. 2019; 55(2):177-181. DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12413. View