» Articles » PMID: 39342219

Evaluating Waterlogging Stress Response and Recovery in Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.): an Image-based Phenotyping Approach

Overview
Journal Plant Methods
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Sep 28
PMID 39342219
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Waterlogging is expected to become a more prominent yield restricting stress for barley as rainfall frequency is increasing in many regions due to climate change. The duration of waterlogging events in the field is highly variable throughout the season, and this variation is also observed in experimental waterlogging studies. Such variety of protocols make intricate physiological responses challenging to assess and quantify. To assess barley waterlogging tolerance in controlled conditions, we present an optimal duration and setup of simulated waterlogging stress using image-based phenotyping. Six protocols durations, 5, 10, and 14 days of stress with and without seven days of recovery, were tested. To quantify the physiological effects of waterlogging on growth and greenness, we used top down and side view RGB (Red-Green-Blue) images. These images were taken daily throughout each of the protocols using the PSI PlantScreen™ imaging platform. Two genotypes of two-row spring barley, grown in glasshouse conditions, were subjected to each of the six protocols, with stress being imposed at the three-leaf stage. Shoot biomass and root imaging data were analysed to determine the optimal stress protocol duration, as well as to quantify the growth and morphometric changes of barley in response to waterlogging stress. Our time-series results show a significant growth reduction and alteration of greenness, allowing us to determine an optimal protocol duration of 14 days of stress and seven days of recovery for controlled conditions. Moreover, to confirm the reproducibility of this protocol, we conducted the same experiment in a different facility equipped with RGB and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging sensors. Our results demonstrate that the selected protocol enables the assessment of genotypic differences, which allow us to further determine tolerance responses in a glasshouse environment. Altogether, this work presents a new and reproducible image-based protocol to assess early stage waterlogging tolerance, empowering a precise quantification of waterlogging stress relevant markers such as greenness, Fv/Fm and growth rates.

References
1.
Bailey-Serres J, Voesenek L . Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008; 59:313-39. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092752. View

2.
Smith P, Gregory P . Climate change and sustainable food production. Proc Nutr Soc. 2012; 72(1):21-8. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665112002832. View

3.
Tian L, Zhang Y, Chen P, Zhang F, Li J, Yan F . How Does the Waterlogging Regime Affect Crop Yield? A Global Meta-Analysis. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:634898. PMC: 7933672. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.634898. View

4.
Fukao T, Barrera-Figueroa B, Juntawong P, Pena-Castro J . Submergence and Waterlogging Stress in Plants: A Review Highlighting Research Opportunities and Understudied Aspects. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10:340. PMC: 6439527. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00340. View

5.
Daniel K, Hartman S . How plant roots respond to waterlogging. J Exp Bot. 2023; 75(2):511-525. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erad332. View