» Articles » PMID: 39337242

Assessing Patient Satisfaction and the Need for Collaborative Treatment with Korean and Western Medicine

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Sep 28
PMID 39337242
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The collaborative treatment of Korean medicine (KM) and Western medicine (WM) in Korea has gained prominence since its initiation. However, comprehensive evaluations of patient satisfaction and care effectiveness remain limited. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction and the need for collaborative KM-WM treatment in the fourth phase of the national pilot project.

Methods: A multicenter survey was conducted among 321 patients from 15 institutions participating in the fourth phase of the collaborative KM-WM pilot project, spanning from 1 August 2023 to 31 October 2023. Patient satisfaction and needs were assessed using a validated, semi-structured questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics and hierarchical multiple regression were used in the analysis.

Results: The overall satisfaction with collaborative KM-WM treatment was notably high (91.25%). Among the participants, 91.58% indicated the necessity of the collaborative KM-WM pilot project, whereas 90.66% pointed out the need to incorporate inpatient services into collaborative care. Expansion of the pilot project to additional institutions and primary healthcare settings was substantially demanded (85.36% and 80.06%, respectively). Treatment effects (, 0.344; 95% CI: 0.237-0.451), appropriate treatment time (, 0.140; 95% CI: 0.051-0.229), medical procedural efficiency (, 0.227; 95% CI: 0.126-0.328), and promotional activities (, 0.175; 95% CI: 0.101-0.250) significantly contributed to overall patient satisfaction (each, < 0.05).

Conclusions: The fourth phase of the KM-WM project reflects high patient satisfaction and a substantial need for collaborative treatment. Further research should include longitudinal studies and employ mixed-methods approaches to better understand, evaluate, and improve collaborative KM-WM treatment.

References
1.
Choi B, Han D, Na S, Lim B . Factors related to the parallel use of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional medicine among patients with chronic conditions in South Korea. Integr Med Res. 2017; 6(2):223-229. PMC: 5478282. DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2017.04.002. View

2.
Kwon S, Heo S, Kim D, Kang S, Woo J . Changes in trust and the use of Korean medicine in South Korea: a comparison of surveys in 2011 and 2014. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017; 17(1):463. PMC: 5603087. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1969-8. View

3.
Lee H, Cho M, Kim N, Lee S, Gong N, Hyun E . Comparative Effectiveness of Collaborative Treatment with Korean and Western Medicine for Low Back Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021; 2021:5535857. PMC: 8342155. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5535857. View

4.
Lee B, Yang C, Yim M . Factors Affecting Korean Medicine Health Care Use for Functional Dyspepsia: Analysis of the Korea Health Panel Survey 2017. Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(7). PMC: 9320755. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10071192. View

5.
Choi Y, Kim C . Identifying the Relationship between the Korean Medicine and Western Medicine in Factors Affecting Medical Service Use. Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(9). PMC: 9498601. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10091697. View