» Articles » PMID: 39337140

Flexible Versus Rigid Bronchoscopy for Tracheobronchial Foreign Body Removal in Children: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Sep 28
PMID 39337140
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The removal of foreign bodies (FBs) from the airways of children is a critical procedure that can avert serious complications. While both flexible and rigid bronchoscopy techniques are employed for this purpose, their comparative efficacy and safety remain subjects of debate. Therefore, we conducted this investigation to compare between both procedures. Studies comparing flexible to rigid bronchoscopy ( = 14) were identified by searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. We performed comparative meta-analyses of reported presentation characteristics and clinical outcomes, using fixed- and random-effects models. A diverse range of FB types and locations were identified. No difference was observed in the success rate of FB removal between flexible and rigid bronchoscopy (logOR = 0.27; 95%CI: -1.91:2.45). The rate of negative first bronchoscopy was higher in the flexible compared to the rigid group (logOR = 2.68; 95%CI: 1.68:3.67). Conversion rates to the alternative method were higher in the flexible bronchoscopy group. The overall complication rates were similar between both methods; however, the risk of desaturation was significantly lower with flexible bronchoscopy (logOR = -2.22; 95%CI: -3.36:-1.08). Flexible bronchoscopy was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay. The choice of bronchoscopy technique should be tailored to individual case characteristics.

References
1.
Nasir Z, Subha S . A Five-Year Review on Pediatric Foreign Body Aspiration. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021; 25(2):e193-e199. PMC: 8096496. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709739. View

2.
Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

3.
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T . Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14:135. PMC: 4383202. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135. View

4.
Aydogan L, Tuncer U, Soylu L, Kiroglu M, Ozsahinoglu C . Rigid bronchoscopy for the suspicion of foreign body in the airway. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 70(5):823-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.09.010. View

5.
Wu Y, Zhang X, Lin Z, Ding C, Wu Y, Chen Y . Changes in the global burden of foreign body aspiration among under-5 children from 1990 to 2019. Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1235308. PMC: 10506258. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1235308. View