» Articles » PMID: 39337057

Ten-Year Results of the Fitmore Hip Stem with a Focus on Varus/Valgus Alignment and Subsidence-A Retrospective Monocentric Analysis

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Sep 28
PMID 39337057
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hip arthroplasty is a common elective surgery worldwide, with rising numbers due to demographic changes and an emphasis on maintaining physical activity in the elderly. The development of new implant designs, especially shorter uncemented stems, has contributed to the advancement of minimally invasive implantation techniques. However, the long-term in vivo behaviour of these implants, particularly regarding subsidence, stability, and stress shielding, remains to be fully understood. This retrospective, monocentric cohort study analyses the long-term radiographic outcomes of the first 141 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty with the Fitmore Hip Stem between June 2007 and December 2008. It focuses on subsidence, stability, varus-valgus alignment, and the influence of patient-related, anatomical, and surgical factors on implant behaviour over a 10-year follow-up period. The average change in varus/valgus alignment was 0.7° into varus and the average subsidence was 1.7 mm over 10 years, with most changes occurring within the first six weeks postoperatively. The varus-valgus alignment and subsidence did not significantly change after the first year, indicating stable osteointegration of the implant. Neither patient factors (gender, age) nor surgical and implant factors (implantation angle, approach, stem family, size, total offset) had a significant influence on the long-term behaviour of the implant. The Fitmore Hip Stem shows highly reliable long-term stability and integration, unaffected by various patient, surgical, and implant factors, as confirmed by excellent register data. Nevertheless, monitoring of this and other new implants should be continued in order to determine implant behaviour, possible weaknesses, and indication limits at an early stage for the benefit of the patient.

References
1.
Schader J, Thalmann C, Maier K, Schiener T, Stoffel K, Frigg A . Prospective evaluation of clinical and radiographic 10-year results of Fitmore short-stem total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):893. PMC: 10666308. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04359-3. View

2.
Bastian J, Wolf A, Wyss T, Notzli H . Stepped osteotomy of the trochanter for stable, anatomic refixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 467(3):732-8. PMC: 2635470. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0649-x. View

3.
Freitag T, Fuchs M, Woelfle-Roos J, Reichel H, Bieger R . Mid-term migration analysis of a femoral short-stem prosthesis: a five-year EBRA-FCA-study. Hip Int. 2018; 29(2):128-133. DOI: 10.1177/1120700018772277. View

4.
da Silva V, Tribess S, Meneguci J, Sasaki J, Garcia-Meneguci C, Carneiro J . Association between frailty and the combination of physical activity level and sedentary behavior in older adults. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):709. PMC: 6555975. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7062-0. View

5.
Learmonth I, Young C, Rorabeck C . The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007; 370(9597):1508-19. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7. View