» Articles » PMID: 39336300

Optimization of Ceramic Paste Composition for 3D Printing Via Robocasting

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2024 Sep 28
PMID 39336300
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This article presents a procedure for selecting optimal ceramic paste formulations dedicated to the 3D printing process using robocasting technology. This study investigated pastes with varying ceramic powder particle sizes and different proportions of additives, such as ceramic microspheres and nutshells. This selection process allowed for the classification of ceramic mixtures into those suitable and unsuitable for this additive manufacturing technique. Subsequently, the viscosity of the pastes was measured, and extrudability tests were performed to determine the force required for extrusion and evaluate the quality of the extruded material. In the final stage, the setting time of the ceramic pastes was assessed to establish the drying time of the printed elements. It was found that the length of the extruded band of ceramic paste was inversely proportional to the Al₂O₃ content. Moreover, the extrusion force for samples with varying ceramic powder particle sizes (MG1-MG5) ranged from 133 to 166 N, compared to 77 N for the base sample (BM1). The obtained results enable further development in robocasting additive technology, including the development of a rapid and effective method for validating ceramic pastes used in this process.

References
1.
Mukhtarkhanov M, Perveen A, Talamona D . Application of Stereolithography Based 3D Printing Technology in Investment Casting. Micromachines (Basel). 2020; 11(10). PMC: 7589843. DOI: 10.3390/mi11100946. View

2.
Gulcan O, Gunaydin K, Tamer A . The State of the Art of Material Jetting-A Critical Review. Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(16). PMC: 8399222. DOI: 10.3390/polym13162829. View

3.
Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, McClinton A, Laurencin C . Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials. 2019; 226:119536. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536. View

4.
Tsolakis I, Gizani S, Panayi N, Antonopoulos G, Tsolakis A . Three-Dimensional Printing Technology in Orthodontics for Dental Models: A Systematic Review. Children (Basel). 2022; 9(8). PMC: 9330810. DOI: 10.3390/children9081106. View

5.
Saadi M, Maguire A, Pottackal N, Thakur M, Ikram M, Hart A . Direct Ink Writing: A 3D Printing Technology for Diverse Materials. Adv Mater. 2022; 34(28):e2108855. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202108855. View