» Articles » PMID: 39335766

The Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Infiltrations Combined with Early Rehabilitation in the Management of Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Observational Study

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Sep 28
PMID 39335766
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Low back pain is a prevalent condition affecting 60-85% of individuals during their lifetime. Despite various proposed mechanisms, the etiology of low back pain remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of combining ultrasound-guided infiltrations with early rehabilitation in reducing pain and improving functional limitations in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. A retrospective observational study was conducted, reviewing data from January to April 2024 involving 40 patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Each patient received two cycles of ultrasound-guided lidocaine and corticosteroid infiltrations at the level of the posterior lower iliac spine, followed by 10 rehabilitation sessions. Patients were assessed at baseline (T0), after the first treatment cycle (T1), and after the second cycle (T2) using the Oswestry Disability Index, Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, Roland Disability Questionnaire, and Numeric Rating Scale. Significant improvements were observed across all assessment scales. The ODI scores decreased from 33.5 at baseline to 3.5 after treatment ( < 0.001). Similar reductions were noted in the QBPDS (from 61.5 to 10.3), RDQ (from 18 to 3.4), and NRS (from 7.4 to 1.3). The combination of ultrasound-guided infiltrations and early rehabilitation resulted in a significant reduction in pain and disability, with the most notable improvements occurring after the second treatment cycle. The integration of ultrasound-guided infiltrations with early rehabilitation is highly effective in managing chronic nonspecific low back pain, significantly reducing both pain and functional limitations.

Citing Articles

Musculoskeletal Diseases: Aetiology, Clinical Implications, Rehabilitation and Treatment.

Fari G, Bernetti A J Pers Med. 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39852227 PMC: 11766573. DOI: 10.3390/jpm15010035.

References
1.
Hartrick C, Kovan J, Shapiro S . The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure?. Pain Pract. 2006; 3(4):310-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-7085.2003.03034.x. View

2.
Korbe S, Udoji E, Ness T, Udoji M . Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures for chronic pain management. Pain Manag. 2015; 5(6):465-82. PMC: 4976830. DOI: 10.2217/pmt.15.46. View

3.
Hicks G, Simonsick E, Harris T, Newman A, Weiner D, Nevitt M . Trunk muscle composition as a predictor of reduced functional capacity in the health, aging and body composition study: the moderating role of back pain. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005; 60(11):1420-4. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/60.11.1420. View

4.
Diez-Buil H, Hernandez-Lucas P, Leiros-Rodriguez R, Echeverria-Garcia O . Effects of the combination of exercise and education in the treatment of low back and/or pelvic pain in pregnant women: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023; 164(3):811-822. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15000. View

5.
Hayden J, van Tulder M, Malmivaara A, Koes B . Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; (3):CD000335. PMC: 10068907. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000335.pub2. View