Understanding the Emergence of Comorbidity Between Problematic Online Gaming and Gambling: A Network Analysis Approach

Overview

Journal Brain Sci

Publisher MDPI

Date 2024 Sep 28

PMID 39335424

Authors

Marta Bloch

Blazej Misiak

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background/objectives: Problematic online gaming and gambling tend to co-occur. The exact mechanisms underlying this phenomenon and the potential effects of gender differences remain unknown. This study aimed to identify the early clustering patterns of problematic online gaming and gambling in a community sample of young adults without a lifetime history of psychiatric treatment.

Methods: Data were collected through an online survey and analyzed using partial correlations and Bayesian networks.

Results: Altogether, 1441 individuals (aged 18-40 years, 51.4% females) participated in the survey. Both problematic online behaviors were weakly interrelated, suggesting that they serve as distinct constructs. Men's networks appeared to be more complex and had significantly higher global connectivity. Moreover, men and women differed with respect to the specific nodes that bridged both constructs. In men, the bridge nodes were "being criticized because of betting or being told about gambling problems", "loss of previous interests due to gaming", "deceiving other people because of gaming", and "health consequences of gambling". Among women, the bridge nodes were "feeling guilty because of gambling", "loss of previous interests because of gaming", "social consequences of gaming", and "continued gaming problems with other people". In men, the strongest edge was found between "borrowing money/selling anything to gamble" and "financial problems because of gambling", while in women, the strongest edge appeared between "betting more than afforded to be lost" and "tolerance symptoms of gambling".

Conclusions: The findings indicate that problematic online gaming and gambling tend to emerge in different ways among men and women. Therapeutic interventions should be planned considering gender differences.

References

van Borkulo C, van Bork R, Boschloo L, Kossakowski J, Tio P, Schoevers R . Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. Psychol Methods. 2022; 28(6):1273-1285. DOI: 10.1037/met0000476. View

Yen J, Liu T, Wang P, Chen C, Yen C, Ko C . Association between Internet gaming disorder and adult attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder and their correlates: Impulsivity and hostility. Addict Behav. 2016; 64:308-313. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.04.024. View

Becker J, McClellan M, Glover Reed B . Sex differences, gender and addiction. J Neurosci Res. 2016; 95(1-2):136-147. PMC: 5120656. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.23963. View

Pickard H, Ahmed S, Foddy B . Alternative models of addiction. Front Psychiatry. 2015; 6:20. PMC: 4327176. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00020. View

Becker J, Perry A, Westenbroek C . Sex differences in the neural mechanisms mediating addiction: a new synthesis and hypothesis. Biol Sex Differ. 2012; 3(1):14. PMC: 3724495. DOI: 10.1186/2042-6410-3-14. View

Fattore L, Melis M, Fadda P, Fratta W . Sex differences in addictive disorders. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014; 35(3):272-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.04.003. View

Sussman S, Lisha N, Griffiths M . Prevalence of the addictions: a problem of the majority or the minority?. Eval Health Prof. 2010; 34(1):3-56. PMC: 3134413. DOI: 10.1177/0163278710380124. View

Hing N, Russell A, Tolchard B, Nower L . Risk Factors for Gambling Problems: An Analysis by Gender. J Gambl Stud. 2015; 32(2):511-34. PMC: 4875054. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-015-9548-8. View

King D, Delfabbro P . Predatory monetization schemes in video games (e.g. 'loot boxes') and internet gaming disorder. Addiction. 2018; 113(11):1967-1969. DOI: 10.1111/add.14286. View

10.

Konkoly Thege B, Hodgins D, Wild T . Co-occurring substance-related and behavioral addiction problems: A person-centered, lay epidemiology approach. J Behav Addict. 2016; 5(4):614-622. PMC: 5370366. DOI: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.079. View

11.

Delfabbro P, King D . Gambling in Australia: experiences, problems, research and policy. Addiction. 2012; 107(9):1556-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03802.x. View

12.

Hevey D . Network analysis: a brief overview and tutorial. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2021; 6(1):301-328. PMC: 8114409. DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2018.1521283. View

13.

Kessler R, Hwang I, Labrie R, Petukhova M, Sampson N, Winters K . DSM-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychol Med. 2008; 38(9):1351-60. PMC: 2293303. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291708002900. View

14.

Rho M, Lee H, Lee T, Cho H, Jung D, Kim D . Risk Factors for Internet Gaming Disorder: Psychological Factors and Internet Gaming Characteristics. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 15(1). PMC: 5800139. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15010040. View

15.

Hunt B, Zarate D, Gill P, Stavropoulos V . Mapping the links between sexual addiction and gambling disorder: A Bayesian network approach. Psychiatry Res. 2023; 327:115366. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115366. View

16.

Fattore L, Melis M . Editorial: Exploring Gender and Sex Differences in Behavioral Dyscontrol: From Drug Addiction to Impulse Control Disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2016; 7:19. PMC: 4762070. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00019. View

17.

McCormack A, Shorter G, Griffiths M . An empirical study of gender differences in online gambling. J Gambl Stud. 2012; 30(1):71-88. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-012-9341-x. View

18.

Briganti G, Scutari M, McNally R . A tutorial on bayesian networks for psychopathology researchers. Psychol Methods. 2022; 28(4):947-961. DOI: 10.1037/met0000479. View

19.

Ross M, Mansson S, Daneback K . Prevalence, severity, and correlates of problematic sexual Internet use in Swedish men and women. Arch Sex Behav. 2011; 41(2):459-66. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-011-9762-0. View

20.

Stevens M, Dorstyn D, Delfabbro P, King D . Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020; 55(6):553-568. DOI: 10.1177/0004867420962851. View