» Articles » PMID: 39335299

Wild Boar Proves High Tolerance to Human-Caused Disruptions: Management Implications in African Swine Fever Outbreaks

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2024 Sep 28
PMID 39335299
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Currently, African swine fever (ASF), a highly fatal disease has become pervasive, with outbreaks recorded across European countries, leading to preventative measures to restrict wild boar ( L.) movement, and, therefore, keep ASF from spreading. This study aims to detail how specific human activities-defined as "car", "dog", "chainsaw", and "tourism"-affect wild boar behavior, considering the disturbance proximity, and evaluate possible implications for wild boar management in ASF-affected areas. Wild boar behavior was studied using advanced biologging technology. This study tracks and analyzes wild boar movements and behavioral responses to human disturbances. This study utilizes the dead reckoning method to precisely reconstruct the animal movements and evaluate behavioral changes based on proximity to disturbances. The sound of specific human activities was reproduced for telemetered animals from forest roads from different distances. Statistical analyses show that wild boars exhibit increased vigilance and altered movement patterns in response to closer human activity, but only in a small number of cases and with no significantly longer time scale. The relative representation of behaviors after disruption confirmed a high instance of resting behavior (83%). Running was the least observed reaction in only 0.9% of all cases. The remaining reactions were identified as foraging (5.1%), walking (5.0%), standing (2.2%), and other (3.8%). The findings suggest that while human presence and activities do influence wild boar behavior, adherence to movement restrictions and careful management of human activity in ASF-infected areas is not a necessary measure if human movement is limited to forest roads.

References
1.
Martin J, Reale D . Animal temperament and human disturbance: implications for the response of wildlife to tourism. Behav Processes. 2007; 77(1):66-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.06.004. View

2.
Guinat C, Vergne T, Jurado-Diaz C, Sanchez-Vizcaino J, Dixon L, Pfeiffer D . Effectiveness and practicality of control strategies for African swine fever: what do we really know?. Vet Rec. 2016; 180(4):97. PMC: 5293861. DOI: 10.1136/vr.103992. View

3.
Tolvanen A, Kangas K . Tourism, biodiversity and protected areas--Review from northern Fennoscandia. J Environ Manage. 2016; 169:58-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.12.011. View

4.
Gervasi V, Sordilli M, Loi F, Guberti V . Estimating the Directional Spread of Epidemics in Their Early Stages Using a Simple Regression Approach: A Study on African Swine Fever in Northern Italy. Pathogens. 2023; 12(6). PMC: 10305390. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12060812. View

5.
Mur L, Atzeni M, Martinez-Lopez B, Feliziani F, Rolesu S, Sanchez-Vizcaino J . Thirty-Five-Year Presence of African Swine Fever in Sardinia: History, Evolution and Risk Factors for Disease Maintenance. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2014; 63(2):e165-77. DOI: 10.1111/tbed.12264. View