» Articles » PMID: 39331097

Handheld Ultrasound for Portal Vein Evaluation in Pediatric Patients

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2024 Sep 27
PMID 39331097
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess diagnostic capabilities of a modern handheld ultrasound device (HUD) for portal vein (PV) evaluation in pediatric patients and to verify if age, body mass index (BMI) and object depth correlate to imagequality.

Methods: 45 patients (3.9 months- 17.9 years; 10.3 years±5.4) were examined using a HUD and cart-based high-end ultrasound system (HEUS). The intra-and extrahepatic PV was scanned using B-Mode and Color-coded Doppler sonography (CCDS). A five-point Likert scale was applied to evaluate image quality. Results were interpreted by two readers in consensus. Scores were compared between the scanners and correlated to age, BMI and skin-to-portal-vein-distance (SPVD). The influence on image quality and the difference between the two devices were analyzed using ordinal and Bayesian logistic regression models.

Results: ≥4 points (mild or no limitations) were achieved by the HUD in 60% for B-Mode and 56% for CCDS. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between the image quality achieved by the HUD and the SPVD for B-Mode and CCDS. The effect of BMI and SPVD on having≥4 points differed significantly between the HUD and HEUS for B-Mode and for CCDS.

Conclusions: Sufficient to excellent image quality for portal vein assessment in pediatric patients was achieved by the HUD except for the most deep-lying structures. Compared to HEUS, diagnostic performance of the HUD is lower, based on a negative correlation with object depth.

References
1.
Le M, Voigt L, Nathanson R, Maw A, Johnson G, Dancel R . Comparison of four handheld point-of-care ultrasound devices by expert users. Ultrasound J. 2022; 14(1):27. PMC: 9263020. DOI: 10.1186/s13089-022-00274-6. View

2.
Singh Y, Tissot C, Fraga M, Yousef N, Cortes R, Lopez J . International evidence-based guidelines on Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). Crit Care. 2020; 24(1):65. PMC: 7041196. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2787-9. View

3.
Becker D, Tafoya C, Becker S, Kruger G, Tafoya M, Becker T . The use of portable ultrasound devices in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature. Trop Med Int Health. 2015; 21(3):294-311. DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12657. View

4.
Sidhu P, Ewertsen C, Piskunowicz M, Secil M, Ricci P, Fischer T . Diversity of current ultrasound practice within and outside radiology departments with a vision for 20 years into the future: a position paper of the ESR ultrasound subcommittee. Insights Imaging. 2023; 14(1):202. PMC: 10673807. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01548-w. View

5.
Fischer T, Filimonow S, Petersein J, Beyersdorff D, Muhler M, Bollow M . [Ultrasound at the bedside: does a portable ultrasound device save time?]. Ultraschall Med. 2002; 23(5):311-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35053. View