» Articles » PMID: 39329542

Training and Familiarization with Industrial Exoskeletons: A Review of Considerations, Protocols, and Approaches for Effective Implementation

Overview
Date 2024 Sep 27
PMID 39329542
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Effective training programs are essential for safely integrating exoskeletons (EXOs) in industrial workplaces. Since the effects of wearable systems depend highly upon their proper use, lack of training of end-users may cause adverse effects on users. We reviewed articles that incorporated training and familiarization protocols to train novices on proper operation/use of EXOs. Findings showed variation in training methods that were implemented to train study participants in EXO evaluation studies. Studies also indicate that multiple (up to four) sessions may be needed for novice EXO wearers to match movement patterns of experts, and training can offer benefits in enhancing motor learning in novices. Biomechanical assessments and ergonomic evaluations can be helpful in developing EXO-specific training protocols by determining training parameters (duration/number of sessions and task difficulty). Future directions include development of personalized training approaches by assessing user behavior/performance through integration of emerging sensing technologies. Application of simulators and use of data-driven approaches for customizing training protocols to individuals, tasks, and EXO design are provided along with a comprehensive training framework. Discussed elements in this article can be helpful to exoskeleton researchers in familiarizing novice users to EXOs prior to evaluation, and to practitioners in developing protocols for training workforce.

References
1.
Kozinc Z, Baltrusch S, Houdijk H, Sarabon N . Short-Term Effects of a Passive Spinal Exoskeleton on Functional Performance, Discomfort and User Satisfaction in Patients with Low Back Pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2020; 31(1):142-152. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-020-09899-7. View

2.
Del Cid D, Larranaga D, Leitao M, Mosher R, Berzenski S, Gandhi V . Exploratory factor analysis and validity of the virtual reality symptom questionnaire and computer use survey. Ergonomics. 2020; 64(1):69-77. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1820083. View

3.
Kermavnar T, de Vries A, de Looze M, OSullivan L . Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: an updated systematic review. Ergonomics. 2020; 64(6):685-711. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1870162. View

4.
Elprama S, Vannieuwenhuyze J, De Bock S, Vanderborght B, De Pauw K, Meeusen R . Social Processes: What Determines Industrial Workers' Intention to Use Exoskeletons?. Hum Factors. 2020; 62(3):337-350. DOI: 10.1177/0018720819889534. View

5.
Alemi M, Simon A, Geissinger J, Asbeck A . Modeling the metabolic reductions of a passive back-support exoskeleton. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2022; 132(3):737-760. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00171.2021. View