» Articles » PMID: 39329025

Ideal Postdischarge Follow-Up After Severe Pneumonia or Acute Respiratory Failure: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Clinicians in Diverse Settings

Overview
Journal CHEST Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2024 Sep 27
PMID 39329025
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Most patients discharged after hospitalization for severe pneumonia or acute respiratory failure receive follow-up care from primary care clinicians, yet guidelines are sparse.

Research Question: What do primary care clinicians consider to be ideal follow-up care after hospitalization for severe pneumonia or acute respiratory failure and what do they perceive to be barriers and facilitators to providing ideal follow-up?

Study Design And Methods: We conducted, via videoconferencing, semistructured interviews of 20 primary care clinicians working in diverse settings from five US states and Washington, DC. Participants described postdischarge visits, ongoing follow-up, and referrals for patients recovering from hospitalizations for pneumonia or respiratory failure bad enough to be hospitalized and to require significant oxygen support or seeking treatment at the ICU. Barriers and facilitators were probed using the capability, opportunity, motivation, behavior framework. Interview summaries and rigorous and accelerated data reduction analysis techniques were used.

Results: Core elements of primary care follow-up after severe pneumonia or acute respiratory failure included safety assessment, medication management, medical specialty follow-up, integrating the hospitalization into the primary care relationship, assessing mental and physical well-being, rehabilitation follow-up, and social context of recovery. Clinicians described specific practices as well as barriers and facilitators at multiple levels to optimal care.

Interpretation: Our findings suggest that at least seven core elements are common in follow-up care after severe pneumonia or acute respiratory failure, and conventional systems include barriers and facilitators to delivering what primary care clinicians consider to be optimal follow-up care. Future research could leverage identified barriers and facilitators to develop implementation tools that enhance the delivery of robust follow-up care for severe pneumonia or acute respiratory failure.

References
1.
Weissman G, Harhay M, Lugo R, Fuchs B, Halpern S, Mikkelsen M . Natural Language Processing to Assess Documentation of Features of Critical Illness in Discharge Documents of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Survivors. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016; 13(9):1538-45. PMC: 5059499. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201602-131OC. View

2.
Qadir N, Sahetya S, Munshi L, Summers C, Abrams D, Beitler J . An Update on Management of Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023; 209(1):24-36. PMC: 10870893. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202311-2011ST. View

3.
Brown S, Wilson E, Presson A, Dinglas V, Greene T, Hopkins R . Understanding patient outcomes after acute respiratory distress syndrome: identifying subtypes of physical, cognitive and mental health outcomes. Thorax. 2017; 72(12):1094-1103. PMC: 5690818. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210337. View

4.
Admon A, Tipirneni R, Prescott H . A framework for improving post-critical illness recovery through primary care. Lancet Respir Med. 2019; 7(7):562-564. PMC: 6599473. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30178-X. View

5.
Prescott H, Angus D . Enhancing Recovery From Sepsis: A Review. JAMA. 2018; 319(1):62-75. PMC: 5839473. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.17687. View