» Articles » PMID: 39328331

Multi-Gene Panel Testing for Hereditary Cancer Predisposition Among Patients Sixty-Five Years and Above Diagnosed With Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal World J Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Sep 27
PMID 39328331
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The availability and affordability of germline genetic testing (GGT) has resulted in a broader utilization in daily clinical practice. However, adherence to testing guidelines is low, especially among older patients, where testing is often not offered.

Methods: In this study, consecutive, newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer (BC) aged ≥ 65 years and eligible for GGT, as per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines (version 1, 2021), were invited to participate, from March 2021 to December 2022. Patients were offered a restricted (two- or 20-gene panel), or an expanded 84-gene panel.

Results: During the study period, 204 patients were enrolled. The mean (standard deviation (SD)) age at BC diagnosis was 70.5 (5.13) years, ranging 65 - 81 years. All patients were Arab and the majority were Jordanian. The majority (n = 188, 92.2%) had early-stage (stages I and II) disease. One hundred three (50.5%) patients were tested with a restricted two-gene (n = 13) or 20-gene (n = 90) panel, while the remaining 101 (49.5%) patients had an expanded 84-gene panel. Family history of close blood relative(s) with BC was the most common indication for testing (n = 110, 53.9%). Among the entire study cohort, 22 (10.8%) had pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) and another 97 (47.5%) had ≥ 1 variants of uncertain significance (VUS). PGV rates were significantly higher with the expanded panel (14.9%) compared to restricted testing (6.8%) (P = 0.032). Similarly, VUS rates were significantly higher with the expanded panel (64.4%) compared to the restricted panel (31.1%) (P < 0.001). The most prevalent genes with PGVs were (31.3% of all PGV-positive patients), (23.1%) and (19.2%).

Conclusion: GGT should not be overlooked in older BC patients, as this study demonstrates that > 10% of patients have PGVs, largely in potentially actionable genes.

References
1.
Childers C, Childers K, Maggard-Gibbons M, Macinko J . National Estimates of Genetic Testing in Women With a History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(34):3800-3806. PMC: 5707208. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.6314. View

2.
Fackenthal J, Olopade O . Breast cancer risk associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in diverse populations. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007; 7(12):937-48. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2054. View

3.
Tung N, Domchek S, Stadler Z, Nathanson K, Couch F, Garber J . Counselling framework for moderate-penetrance cancer-susceptibility mutations. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016; 13(9):581-8. PMC: 5513673. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.90. View

4.
Abdel-Razeq H, Mansour A, Jaddan D . Breast Cancer Care in Jordan. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020; 6:260-268. PMC: 7051801. DOI: 10.1200/JGO.19.00279. View

5.
Abdel-Razeq H, Sharaf B, Bani Hani H, Abu Hijlih R, Alkyam M, Al-Azzam K . Implementation of Universal Pan-Cancer Germline Genetic Testing in an Arab Population: The Jordanian Exploratory Cancer Genetics Study. JCO Glob Oncol. 2024; 10:e2400068. DOI: 10.1200/GO.24.00068. View