Characterizing Serial Dependence As an Attraction to Prior Response

Overview

Journal J Vis

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2024 Sep 26

PMID 39325435

Authors

Geoffrey K Gallagher

Christopher P Benton

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Serial dependence refers to a common misperception that can occur between subsequently observed stimuli. Observers misreport the current stimulus as being more similar to the previous stimulus than it objectively is. It has been proposed that this bias may reflect an attraction of the current percept to prior percept (Fischer & Whitney, 2014). Alternatively, serial dependence has also been proposed to be the result of an assimilative effect between observer decisions (Fritsche, Mostert, & de Lange, 2017; Pascucci, Mancuso, Santandrea, Libera, Plomp, & Chelazzi, 2019). Lying within this debate is the issue of how we quantify serial dependence. Should this be as a bias induced by prior stimuli or by prior responses? We investigated this by manipulating the orientation of the current stimuli such that they fell between previous stimulus and previous response. We observed an attraction to previous response and a concomitant repulsion from previous stimulus. This suggests that the attractive effect of serial dependence in orientation judgments is best quantified in relation to prior response.

Citing Articles

Effects of perceptual and decisional uncertainty on serial dependence in orientation perception.

Little Z, Clifford C Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; .

PMID: 40032814 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-025-03034-5.

References

Sheehan T, Serences J . Attractive serial dependence overcomes repulsive neuronal adaptation. PLoS Biol. 2022; 20(9):e3001711. PMC: 9447932. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001711. View

Pascucci D, Mancuso G, Santandrea E, Della Libera C, Plomp G, Chelazzi L . Laws of concatenated perception: Vision goes for novelty, decisions for perseverance. PLoS Biol. 2019; 17(3):e3000144. PMC: 6400421. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000144. View

Czoschke S, Fischer C, Beitner J, Kaiser J, Bledowski C . Two types of serial dependence in visual working memory. Br J Psychol. 2018; 110(2):256-267. DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12349. View

Ceylan G, Herzog M, Pascucci D . Serial dependence does not originate from low-level visual processing. Cognition. 2021; 212:104709. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104709. View

Cicchini G, Mikellidou K, Burr D . The functional role of serial dependence. Proc Biol Sci. 2018; 285(1890). PMC: 6235035. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1722. View

Liberman A, Zhang K, Whitney D . Serial dependence promotes object stability during occlusion. J Vis. 2016; 16(15):16. PMC: 5214222. DOI: 10.1167/16.15.16. View

Cicchini G, Mikellidou K, Burr D . Serial dependencies act directly on perception. J Vis. 2017; 17(14):6. DOI: 10.1167/17.14.6. View

Fischer J, Whitney D . Serial dependence in visual perception. Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17(5):738-43. PMC: 4012025. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3689. View

Field D . Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am A. 1987; 4(12):2379-94. DOI: 10.1364/josaa.4.002379. View

10.

Suarez-Pinilla M, Seth A, Roseboom W . Serial dependence in the perception of visual variance. J Vis. 2018; 18(7):4. PMC: 6028984. DOI: 10.1167/18.7.4. View

11.

Girshick A, Landy M, Simoncelli E . Cardinal rules: visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(7):926-32. PMC: 3125404. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2831. View

12.

St John-Saaltink E, Kok P, Lau H, de Lange F . Serial Dependence in Perceptual Decisions Is Reflected in Activity Patterns in Primary Visual Cortex. J Neurosci. 2016; 36(23):6186-92. PMC: 6604889. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4390-15.2016. View

13.

Alexi J, Cleary D, Dommisse K, Palermo R, Kloth N, Burr D . Past visual experiences weigh in on body size estimation. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):215. PMC: 5760712. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18418-3. View

14.

Kiyonaga A, Scimeca J, Bliss D, Whitney D . Serial Dependence across Perception, Attention, and Memory. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017; 21(7):493-497. PMC: 5516910. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.011. View

15.

Bosch E, Fritsche M, Ehinger B, de Lange F . Opposite effects of choice history and evidence history resolve a paradox of sequential choice bias. J Vis. 2020; 20(12):9. PMC: 7683864. DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.12.9. View

16.

Gallagher G, Benton C . Stimulus uncertainty predicts serial dependence in orientation judgements. J Vis. 2022; 22(1):6. PMC: 8762691. DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.1.6. View

17.

Lau W, Maus G . Visual serial dependence in an audiovisual stimulus. J Vis. 2019; 19(13):20. DOI: 10.1167/19.13.20. View

18.

Manassi M, Whitney D . Illusion of visual stability through active perceptual serial dependence. Sci Adv. 2022; 8(2):eabk2480. PMC: 11580026. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abk2480. View

19.

Akaishi R, Umeda K, Nagase A, Sakai K . Autonomous mechanism of internal choice estimate underlies decision inertia. Neuron. 2013; 81(1):195-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.018. View

20.

Liberman A, Fischer J, Whitney D . Serial dependence in the perception of faces. Curr Biol. 2014; 24(21):2569-74. PMC: 4254333. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.025. View