» Articles » PMID: 39323750

Younger Age, Hyperextended Knee, Concomitant Meniscectomy and Large Prerevision Anterior Tibial Translation Are Associated with Graft Failure After the Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Overview
Journal J Exp Orthop
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Sep 26
PMID 39323750
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Graft failure following revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is higher than after primary ACL reconstruction. However, data regarding revision surgery is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the associated factors for failure after revision ACL reconstruction.

Methods: Fifty-four patients (mean age: 24.7 ± 10.0 years) who underwent revision ACL reconstruction at our hospital with ≥1 year follow-up were retrospectively examined. Patients were divided into Group F (graft failure) and Group N (no graft failure) groups. Univariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with graft failure. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal thresholds for differentiating between the two groups.

Results: Graft failure was observed in 7 of 54 patients (13.0%). In the univariate analysis, significant differences were observed for age at the initial surgery (Group F: 15.6 ± 1.5, Group N: 20.9 ± 8.1), age at the revision surgery (Group F: 18.0 ± 2.8, Group N: 25.7 ± 10.3), presence of hyperextended knee (Group F: 85.7%, Group N: 14.9%), concomitant meniscectomy (Group F: 42.9%, Group N: 14.9%), prerevision space for the ACL (sACL) (Group F: 7.2 ± 3.4 mm, Group N: 13.4 ± 4.7 mm) and preoperative anterior tibial translation (ATT) (Group F: 5.0 ± 1.4 mm, Group N: 2.7 ± 3.1 m). ROC analysis of preoperative sACL and preoperative ATT on one-leg standing plain radiograph showed that cutoff values of 6.9 and 4.2 mm were the optimal thresholds, respectively.

Conclusion: Younger patients with a hyperextended knee, concomitant meniscectomy, small sACL and large ATT before revision ACL reconstruction are predisposed to graft failure.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV.

References
1.
Tanaka M, Jones K, Gargiulo A, Delos D, Wickiewicz T, Potter H . Passive anterior tibial subluxation in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(10):2347-52. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513498995. View

2.
Wright R, Dunn W, Amendola A, Andrish J, Bergfeld J, Kaeding C . Risk of tearing the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee and rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective MOON cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(7):1131-4. DOI: 10.1177/0363546507301318. View

3.
Tanaka Y, Kita K, Takao R, Amano H, Uchida R, Shiozaki Y . Chronicity of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency, Part 2: Radiographic Predictors of Early Graft Failure. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018; 6(2):2325967117751915. PMC: 5818097. DOI: 10.1177/2325967117751915. View

4.
Akobeng A . Understanding diagnostic tests 3: Receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr. 2007; 96(5):644-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00178.x. View

5.
Marshall S . Recommendations for defining and classifying anterior cruciate ligament injuries in epidemiologic studies. J Athl Train. 2010; 45(5):516-8. PMC: 2938327. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.5.516. View