» Articles » PMID: 39323439

Self-reported Smoking Status and Exhaled Carbon Monoxide in Secondary Preventive Follow-up After Coronary Heart Events: Do Our Patients Tell the Truth?

Overview
Journal Tob Prev Cessat
Date 2024 Sep 26
PMID 39323439
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Smoking cessation reduces the risk of myocardial infarctions (MI) and death in patients with coronary heart disease. Smoking status is frequently assessed based on self-report. The aims of this study were to compare self-reported and objectively measured (exhaled carbon monoxide [eCO]) smoking status after MI, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and to assess whether assumed wrongly declared smoking cessation was associated to poorer achievement of other treatment targets for secondary prevention.

Methods: This study was a sub-analysis from a randomized controlled trial at Sorlandet Hospital, Arendal, Norway, 2007-2022, including patients hospitalized due to MI or after scheduled PCI/CABG, and primarily aimed at comparing secondary preventive follow-up in the outpatient clinic versus primary healthcare. Participants were followed up after the index event through outpatient consultations. Smoking status was assessed by self-report and by eCO (Smokerlyzer, Bedfont, UK) with concentration values ≥6 ppm interpreted as suggesting smoking.

Results: A total of 1540 participants aged 18-80 years were included in the main study. Self-reported smoking status and concomitant eCO measurement one year after the index event were available in 1291 (84%) participants. In all, Brussels, Belgium, from the 12th to the 13th of September 2024. The concentration of eCO was ≥6 ppm one year after the index event in 285 (22%) patients, and 72 (25%) of these patients reported non-smoking. Fewer patients with elevated eCO reporting non-smoking achieved the treatment target for blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg) in comparison to those reporting smoking (53% vs 68%, p=0.02). No differences for the other treatment targets for secondary prevention were found.

Conclusions: The study indicates a need for objective measures for smoking cessation both in clinical studies and in clinical practice, and may indicate a lack of truthfulness regarding smoking habits.

Clinical Trial Registration: The study is registered on the official website of ClinicalTrials.gov.

Identifier: ID NCT00679237.

References
1.
Visseren F, Mach F, Smulders Y, Carballo D, Koskinas K, Back M . 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(34):3227-3337. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484. View

2.
Piepoli M, Hoes A, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano A . 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by.... Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(29):2315-2381. PMC: 4986030. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106. View

3.
Asvold B, Bjorngaard J, Carslake D, Gabrielsen M, Skorpen F, Davey Smith G . Causal associations of tobacco smoking with cardiovascular risk factors: a Mendelian randomization analysis of the HUNT Study in Norway. Int J Epidemiol. 2014; 43(5):1458-70. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyu113. View

4.
Tun B, Ehrbar R, Short M, Cheng S, Vasan R, Xanthakis V . Association of Exhaled Carbon Monoxide With Ideal Cardiovascular Health, Circulating Biomarkers, and Incidence of Heart Failure in the Framingham Offspring Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9(21):e016762. PMC: 7763395. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016762. View

5.
Stelmach R, Fernandes F, Carvalho-Pinto R, Athanazio R, Zahi Rached S, Prado G . Comparison between objective measures of smoking and self-reported smoking status in patients with asthma or COPD: are our patients telling us the truth?. J Bras Pneumol. 2015; 41(2):124-32. PMC: 4428849. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-37132015000004526. View