» Articles » PMID: 39320126

Efficacy of a New Video Observational Training Method (intensive Visual Simulation) for Motor Recovery in the Upper Limb in Subacute Stroke: a Feasibility and Proof-of-concept Study

Overview
Journal J Rehabil Med
Date 2024 Sep 25
PMID 39320126
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy  of a new video-observation training method (intensive visual simulation) to improve upper limb function.

Design: Small sample, randomized, evaluator-blind, monocentric study.

Patients: Seventeen early subacute ischaemic stroke patients with complete hemiplegia were  randomly assigned to the therapeutic group (n = 8) or control group (CG, n = 9).

Methods: Thirty sessions of intensive visual simulation combined with corrected visual feedback (therapeutic group) or uncorrected visual feedback (control group) were performed over 6 weeks on top of a standard rehabilitation programme.

Main Outcome Measure: 400-point hand assessment test (400p-HA).

Secondary Outcome Measures: Box and Blocks (B&B), Purdue Pegboard test, Minnesota.

Results: The 400p-HA test improved significantly from T0 to 6 months for both groups, with a significant difference between groups at 3 months (MW-UT p = 0.046) and 4 months (MW-UT p = 0.046) in favour of the therapeutic group. One-phase exponential modelling of 400p-HA showed a greater plateau for the therapeutic group (F test p = 0.0021). There was also faster recovery of the ability to perform the B&B tests for the therapeutic group (log-rank test p = 0.03).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility and potential efficacy of an intensive visual simulation training programme to improve upper limb  function in subacute stroke patients. A larger study is needed to confirm these results.

References
1.
Kwakkel G, Lannin N, Borschmann K, English C, Ali M, Churilov L . Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke. 2017; 12(5):451-461. DOI: 10.1177/1747493017711813. View

2.
Ramachandran V, Hirstein W . The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain. 1998; 121 ( Pt 9):1603-30. DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.9.1603. View

3.
Hatem S, Saussez G, Della Faille M, Prist V, Zhang X, Dispa D . Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:442. PMC: 5020059. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442. View

4.
Gloss D, Wardle M . Use of the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test for disability evaluation. Percept Mot Skills. 1982; 55(2):527-32. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1982.55.2.527. View

5.
Barclay R, Stevenson T, Poluha W, Semenko B, Schubert J . Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 5:CD005950. PMC: 7387111. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005950.pub5. View