Get BusActive!: Protocol of a Single-blinded Randomised Controlled Trial Incentivising Public Transport Use for Physical Activity Gain Among Young People and Adults

Overview

Journal Contemp Clin Trials Commun

Date 2024 Sep 25

PMID 39319319

Authors

Melanie J Sharman

Oliver Stanesby

Kim A Jose

Stephen Greaves

Anna Timperio

Elizabeth Reid

Lisa Stafford

Petr Otahal

Verity J Cleland

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Population level physical activity generally does not meet recommended targets. Compared with private motor vehicle users, public transport users tend to be more physically active and financial incentives may encourage more public transport use, but these relationships are under-investigated. This paper describes the protocol of a randomised controlled trial that aimed to determine the effect of financially incentivising public transport use on physical activity in a regional Australian setting.

Methods: is a 9.5-month single-blinded randomised controlled trial. A convenience sample of Tasmanians aged ≥15 years will be randomised to a 14-week incentive-based intervention (bus trip target attainment rewarded by bus trip credits and weekly supportive text messages) or an active control following baseline measures and will be followed up ∼24 weeks later (maintenance phase). Both groups will receive written physical activity guidelines. The primary outcome is change in accelerometer-measured steps/day from baseline to immediately post intervention phase and maintenance phase. Secondary outcomes are change in: smartcard-measured bus trips/week; measured and self-reported minutes/week of physical activity and sitting; transport-related behaviour (using one-week travel diary), perspectives (e.g. enablers/barriers) and costs; health. Linear mixed model regression will determine group differences. Participant-level process evaluation will be conducted and intervention cost to the public transport provider determined.

Conclusion: will fill an important knowledge gap about the causal relationship between financially incentivised public transport use and physical activity-the findings will benefit health and transport-related decision makers.

Trial Registration: ACTRN12623000613606.

Universal Trial Number: U1111-1292-3414.

References

Ball K, Hunter R, Maple J, Moodie M, Salmon J, Ong K . Can an incentive-based intervention increase physical activity and reduce sitting among adults? the ACHIEVE (Active Choices IncEntiVE) feasibility study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017; 14(1):35. PMC: 5359829. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0490-2. View

Promberger M, Marteau T . When do financial incentives reduce intrinsic motivation? comparing behaviors studied in psychological and economic literatures. Health Psychol. 2013; 32(9):950-7. PMC: 3906839. DOI: 10.1037/a0032727. View

Bauman A, Reis R, Sallis J, Wells J, Loos R, Martin B . Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not?. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):258-71. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1. View

Jose K, Sharman M, Stanesby O, Greaves S, Venn A, Blizzard L . Incentivising public transport use for physical activity gain: process evaluation of the COVID-19 disrupted trips4health randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022; 19(1):157. PMC: 9772596. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-022-01394-x. View

Marteau T, Ashcroft R, Oliver A . Using financial incentives to achieve healthy behaviour. BMJ. 2009; 338:b1415. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b1415. View

Rissel C, Curac N, Greenaway M, Bauman A . Physical activity associated with public transport use--a review and modelling of potential benefits. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012; 9(7):2454-78. PMC: 3407915. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9072454. View

Conn V, Hafdahl A, Mehr D . Interventions to increase physical activity among healthy adults: meta-analysis of outcomes. Am J Public Health. 2011; 101(4):751-8. PMC: 3052337. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.194381. View

Guthold R, Stevens G, Riley L, Bull F . Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019; 4(1):23-35. PMC: 6919336. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2. View

Giles E, Robalino S, McColl E, Sniehotta F, Adams J . The effectiveness of financial incentives for health behaviour change: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e90347. PMC: 3949711. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090347. View

10.

Evans J, Stanovich K . Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 8(3):223-41. DOI: 10.1177/1745691612460685. View

11.

Santos A, Willumsen J, Meheus F, Ilbawi A, Bull F . The cost of inaction on physical inactivity to public health-care systems: a population-attributable fraction analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2022; 11(1):e32-e39. PMC: 9748301. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00464-8. View

12.

Evans J, Stanesby O, Blizzard L, Jose K, Sharman M, Ball K . trips4health: a single-blinded randomised controlled trial incentivising adult public transport use for physical activity gain. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023; 20(1):98. PMC: 10428598. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01500-7. View

13.

Lee J, Williams S, Brown D, Laurson K . Concurrent validation of the Actigraph gt3x+, Polar Active accelerometer, Omron HJ-720 and Yamax Digiwalker SW-701 pedometer step counts in lab-based and free-living settings. J Sports Sci. 2014; 33(10):991-1000. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2014.981848. View

14.

Hills A, Mokhtar N, Byrne N . Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure: an overview of objective measures. Front Nutr. 2015; 1:5. PMC: 4428382. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2014.00005. View

15.

Lubans D, Hesketh K, Cliff D, Barnett L, Salmon J, Dollman J . A systematic review of the validity and reliability of sedentary behaviour measures used with children and adolescents. Obes Rev. 2011; 12(10):781-99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00896.x. View

16.

Craig C, Marshall A, Sjostrom M, Bauman A, Booth M, Ainsworth B . International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(8):1381-95. DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB. View

17.

Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W . Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015; 350:h1258. PMC: 4366184. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1258. View

18.

Ding D, Ramirez Varela A, Bauman A, Ekelund U, Lee I, Heath G . Towards better evidence-informed global action: lessons learnt from the Lancet series and recent developments in physical activity and public health. Br J Sports Med. 2019; 54(8):462-468. PMC: 7146932. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101001. View

19.

Wen C, Wai J, Tsai M, Yang Y, Cheng T, Lee M . Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2011; 378(9798):1244-53. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60749-6. View

20.

Sharman M, Lyth A, Jose K, Silva Ragaini B, Blizzard L, Johnston F . Acceptability and perceived feasibility of strategies to increase public transport use for physical activity gain - A mixed methods study. Health Promot J Austr. 2019; 31(3):504-517. DOI: 10.1002/hpja.292. View