Telemedicine for Preoperative Assessment, Surgical Appointments, and Preoperative Education in Gynecological Day Surgery: An Prospective Observational Analysis

Overview

Journal Int J Womens Health

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2024 Sep 25

PMID 39319182

Authors

Yueqin Wang

Gufeng Xu

Chenqi Yan

Fang Wang

Min Yang

Yue Wang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: This study investigates the differences in the cost, time, pre-operative education and patient satisfaction levels of patients requiring a second hysteroscopic surgery using a full-service model of remote preoperative assessment, surgical appointments, and preoperative education.

Methods: Forty-one patients who were proficient in the use of telemedicine platforms, planned to undergo a second hysteroscopic surgery, and selected either telemedicine (N=21) or face-to-face (N=20) models for their preoperative assessments, surgical appointments, and preoperative education were included. The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney -test and Fisher's exact test.

Results: No significant demographic differences were observed between patients who used telemedicine and those who did not. The telemedicine group demonstrated significantly lower median travel time (40 min vs 205 min, P < 0.01), time spent in hospital (60 min vs 155 min, P < 0.01), meal time (0 min vs 60 min, P < 0.01), and total time spent (108 min vs 415 min, P < 0.01). Similarly, the telemedicine group had significantly lower median travel expenses (40 yuan vs 300 yuan, P < 0.01) and meal expenses (0 yuan vs 135 yuan, P < 0.01), and overall, total expenses (255 yuan vs 837 yuan, P < 0.01). 95.2% of the telemedicine group completely understood the preoperative education, compared to 100% who completely understood in the face-to-face group (P = 1.00). All patients in the telemedicine group were very satisfied compared to 80% in the face-to-face group (P = 1.00).

Conclusion: Telemedicine may be a feasible and advantageous method for preoperative assessment, surgical appointments, and preoperative education in gynecological day surgery. The application of telemedicine has demonstrated notable time and cost efficiency with high patient satisfaction levels. Future research should explore the full potential of telemedicine in this setting and for other surgical procedures.

References

Siedhoff M, Truong M, Wright K . The role of telemedicine in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 34(4):270-274. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000790. View

Mezes C, Klebanoff J, Grebenyuk E, Gobern J, Meske S, Amdur R . Virtual postoperative visits following robotic gynecologic surgery: a study of patient satisfaction, safety, and feasibility. J Robot Surg. 2022; 16(5):1193-1198. PMC: 8801288. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01354-w. View

Smit R, Mouchtouris N, Reyes M, Piper K, Yu S, Collopy S . The use of telemedicine in pre-surgical evaluation: a retrospective cohort study of a neurosurgical oncology practice. J Neurooncol. 2022; 159(3):621-626. PMC: 9331029. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04102-8. View

Asiri A, Albishi S, AlMadani W, ElMetwally A, Househ M . The Use of Telemedicine in Surgical Care: a Systematic Review. Acta Inform Med. 2018; 26(3):201-206. PMC: 6195401. DOI: 10.5455/aim.2018.26.201-206. View

Thompson J, Cichowski S, Rogers R, Qeadan F, Zambrano J, Wenzl C . Outpatient visits versus telephone interviews for postoperative care: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2019; 30(10):1639-1646. PMC: 6699921. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-03895-z. View

Murugesu S, Galazis N, Jones B, Chan M, Bracewell-Milnes T, Ahmed-Salim Y . Evaluating the use of telemedicine in gynaecological practice: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(12):e039457. PMC: 7722813. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039457. View

Muschol J, Heinrich M, Heiss C, Knapp G, Repp H, Schneider H . Assessing Telemedicine Efficiency in Follow-up Care With Video Consultations for Patients in Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery in Germany: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(7):e36996. PMC: 9377439. DOI: 10.2196/36996. View

Wienhold J, Mosch L, Rossaint R, Kemper I, Derwall M, Czaplik M . Teleconsultation for preoperative evaluation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A technical and medical feasibility study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021; 38(12):1284-1292. PMC: 8630926. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001616. View

Champion A, Congiusta A, Yagnik A . Comparison of patient satisfaction measures between in-person and telemedicine postoperative appointments following third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 50(6):830-834. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.12.012. View

10.

Thatcher M, Thatcher M, Smith M, McCarron M, Reed J . Opportunity costs of attending surgical clinic appointments and experiences with telemedicine for follow-up care. SAGE Open Med. 2021; 9:20503121211045247. PMC: 8436310. DOI: 10.1177/20503121211045247. View

11.

DAlmeida Lucas Macharet D, Mendes L, Pereira G, Vale de Castro Monteiro M . Implementing telemedicine in urogynecology: A feasibility study. Int Urogynecol J. 2022; 34(7):1487-1493. PMC: 9638453. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05392-2. View

12.

Lee S, Hitt W . Clinical Applications of Telemedicine in Gynecology and Women's Health. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020; 47(2):259-270. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2020.02.002. View

13.

Ingraham C, Makai G . Perioperative visits in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 35(4):316-320. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000883. View

14.

Gaj F, Peracchini M, Passannanti D, Quaresima S, Giovanardi F, Lai Q . Use of telemedicine in the postoperative assessment of proctological patients: a case-control study. Tech Coloproctol. 2022; 27(2):153-158. PMC: 9629887. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02723-9. View

15.

Radtke S, Umeh R, Chavez M, Curiel Z, Mendez K . Utilizing Telemedicine for Delivery of Postoperative Care Following Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021; 10(3):148-153. PMC: 8384027. DOI: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_66_20. View

16.

Kane L, Thakar O, Jamgochian G, Lazarus M, Abboud J, Namdari S . The role of telehealth as a platform for postoperative visits following rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(4):775-783. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.004. View

17.

Segura-Sampedro J, Rivero-Belenchon I, Pino-Diaz V, Sanchez M, Pareja-Ciuro F, Padillo-Ruiz J . Feasibility and safety of surgical wound remote follow-up by smart phone in appendectomy: A pilot study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017; 21:58-62. PMC: 5537421. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.07.040. View