» Articles » PMID: 39315540

User Engagement with Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: a Multinational Cohort Using Real-world Data Collected with a Connected Device

Overview
Journal J Hypertens
Date 2024 Sep 24
PMID 39315540
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Connected blood pressure (BP) monitors provide reliable data when used properly. Our objective was to analyse the engagement of real-world users with self-measurements.

Methods: We included adult first-time users of a connected BP monitor from July 2019 to March 2021. They were categorized as persistent users if they continued to use the device between 311 and 400 days after inclusion. We defined a criterion to analyse the timing of self-measurements: at least 12 measurements performed within three consecutive days, at least once every 90 days. Persistent users were clustered by state sequence analysis according to the consistency of their BP monitor measurement timing with this criterion during 1 year of follow-up.

Results: Among the 22 177 included users, 11 869 (54%) were persistent during the first year. Their use was consistent with the timing criterion 25% (median) of this time (first and third quartiles: 0%, 50%) and four patterns of use were identified by clustering: 5215 persistent users (44%) only performed occasional sparse measurements, 4054 (34%) complied at the start of follow-up up to eight cumulated months, 1113 (9%) complied at least once during later follow-up up to eight cumulated months, and the remaining 1487 (13%) complied nine or more cumulated months of follow-up.

Conclusion: Although connected BP monitors can collect a high volume of data, the real-life timing of self-measurements is far from recommended schedules. We must promote the use of BP monitors as recommended by guidelines and/or learn to analyse more occasional and sparse measurements.

References
1.
Tran K, Padwal R, Khan N, Wright M, Chan W . Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ Open. 2021; 9(2):E642-E650. PMC: 8248564. DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200099. View

2.
Parati G, Stergiou G, Bilo G, Kollias A, Pengo M, Ochoa J . Home blood pressure monitoring: methodology, clinical relevance and practical application: a 2021 position paper by the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2021; 39(9):1742-1767. PMC: 9904446. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002922. View

3.
Nguena Nguefack H, Page M, Katz J, Choiniere M, Vanasse A, Dorais M . Trajectory Modelling Techniques Useful to Epidemiological Research: A Comparative Narrative Review of Approaches. Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 12:1205-1222. PMC: 7608582. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S265287. View

4.
ACourt C, Jenkins W, Reidy C, Papoutsi C . Patient-initiated cardiovascular monitoring with commercially available devices: How useful is it in a cardiology outpatient setting? Mixed methods, observational study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022; 22(1):428. PMC: 9520849. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02860-x. View

5.
Zelveian P, Topouchian J, Hakobyan Z, Asmar J, Gharibyan H, Asmar R . Clinical Accuracy of the Withings BPM Connect for Self-Blood Pressure Measurements in Pregnancy and Pre-Eclampsia: Validation According to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International.... Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022; 18:181-189. PMC: 8967988. DOI: 10.2147/VHRM.S351313. View