» Articles » PMID: 39315122

Non-Medical Switching or Discontinuation Patterns Among Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the United States: A Claims-Based Analysis

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Sep 24
PMID 39315122
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study assessed direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) switching/discontinuation patterns in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in 2019, by quarter (Q1-Q4), and associated socioeconomic risk factors. Adults with NVAF initiating stable DOAC treatment (July 2018-December 2018) were selected from Symphony Health Solutions' Patient Transactional Datasets (April 2017-January 2021). Switching/discontinuation rates were reported in 2019 Q1-Q4, separately. Non-medical switching/discontinuation (NMSD) was defined as the difference between switching/discontinuation rates in Q1 and mean rates across Q2-Q4. The associations of socioeconomic factors with switching/discontinuation were assessed. Of 46,793 patients (78.7% ≥ 65 years; 52.6% male; 7.7% Black), 18.0% switched/discontinued their initial DOAC in Q1 vs. 8.8% on average in Q2-Q4, corresponding to an NMSD of 9.2%. During the quarter following the switch/discontinuation, more patients who switched/discontinued in Q1 remained untreated (Q1: 77.0%; Q2: 74.3%; Q3: 71.2%) and fewer reinitiated initial DOAC (Q1: 17.6%; Q2: 20.8%; Q3: 24.0%). Factors associated with the risk of switching/discontinuation in Q1 were race, age, gender, insurance type, and household income (all < 0.05). More patients with NVAF switched/discontinued DOACs in Q1 vs. Q2-Q4, and more of them tended to remain untreated relative to those who switched/discontinued later in the year, suggesting a potential long-term impact of NMSD. Findings on factors associated with switching/discontinuation highlight potential socioeconomic discrepancies in treatment continuity.

References
1.
Gupta K, Trocio J, Keshishian A, Zhang Q, Dina O, Mardekian J . Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019; 19(1):142. PMC: 6567643. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-019-1116-1. View

2.
Kachroo S, Hamilton M, Liu X, Pan X, Brixner D, Marrouche N . Oral anticoagulant discontinuation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Manag Care. 2016; 22(1):e1-8. View

3.
January C, Samuel Wann L, Calkins H, Chen L, Cigarroa J, Cleveland Jr J . 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the.... J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74(1):104-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011. View

4.
Farinha J, Jones I, Lip G . Optimizing adherence and persistence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant therapy in atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022; 24(Suppl A):A42-A55. PMC: 8850710. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/suab152. View

5.
Klijn C, Paciaroni M, Berge E, Korompoki E, Korv J, Lal A . Antithrombotic treatment for secondary prevention of stroke and other thromboembolic events in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack and non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A European Stroke Organisation guideline. Eur Stroke J. 2020; 4(3):198-223. PMC: 6960695. DOI: 10.1177/2396987319841187. View