» Articles » PMID: 39314255

Utilization of Inpatient Palliative Care Services in Cardiac Arrest Complicating Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Overview
Journal Resusc Plus
Date 2024 Sep 24
PMID 39314255
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The role of palliative care services in patients with cardiac arrest complicating acute pulmonary embolism has been infrequently studied.

Methods: All adult admissions with pulmonary embolism complicating cardiac arrest were identified using the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020). The primary outcome of interest was the utilization of palliative care services. Secondary outcomes included predictors of palliative care utilization and its association of with in-hospital mortality, do-not-resuscitate status, discharge disposition, length of stay, and total hospital charges. Multivariable regression analysis was used to adjust for confounding.

Results: Between 01/01/2016 and 12/31/2020, of the 7,320 admissions with pulmonary embolism complicating cardiac arrest, 1229 (16.8 %) received palliative care services. Admissions receiving palliative care were on average older (68.1 ± 0.9 vs. 63.2 ± 0.4 years) and with higher baseline comorbidity (Elixhauser index 6.3 ± 0.1 vs 5.6 ± 0.6) (all p < 0.001). Additionally, this cohort had higher rates of non-cardiac organ failure (respiratory, renal, hepatic, and neurological) and invasive mechanical ventilation (all p < 0.05). Catheter-directed therapy was used less frequently in the cohort receiving palliative care, (2.8 % vs 7.9 %; p < 0.001) whereas the rates of systemic thrombolysis, mechanical and surgical thrombectomy were comparable. The cohort receiving palliative care services had higher in-hospital mortality (85.7 % vs. 69.1 %; adjusted odds ratio 2.20 [95 % CI 1.41-3.42]; p < 0.001). This cohort also had higher rates of do-not-resuscitate status and fewer discharges to home, but comparable hospitalization costs and length of hospital stay.

Conclusions: Palliative care services are used in only 16.8 % of admissions with cardiac arrest complicating pulmonary embolism with significant differences in the populations, suggestive of selective consultation.

References
1.
Khera R, Krumholz H . With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Big Data Research From the National Inpatient Sample. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017; 10(7). PMC: 5728376. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003846. View

2.
Burles K, Innes G, Senior K, Lang E, McRae A . Limitations of pulmonary embolism ICD-10 codes in emergency department administrative data: let the buyer beware. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017; 17(1):89. PMC: 5465555. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0361-1. View

3.
Thangavel S, Korsholm K, Veien K, Larsen K, Andersen A . Catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy in a patient with high-risk pulmonary embolism complicated by out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2023; 7(7):ytad307. PMC: 10358429. DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad307. View

4.
Morrone D, Morrone V . Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Focus on the Clinical Picture. Korean Circ J. 2018; 48(5):365-381. PMC: 5940642. DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0314. View

5.
Vallabhajosyula S, Barsness G, Herrmann J, Anavekar N, Gulati R, Prasad A . Comparison of Complications and In-Hospital Mortality in Takotsubo (Apical Ballooning/Stress) Cardiomyopathy Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2020; 132:29-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.07.015. View