The Change in Lumbar Lordosis from the Standing to the Lateral Position: Implications for Lateral Interbody Fusion

Overview

Journal Eur Spine J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 Sep 23

PMID 39313682

Authors

Emily S Mills

Jennifer C Wang

Mary K Richardson

Brian C Chung

Lucas W Mayer

Matthew C Gallo

Ram K Alluri

Raymond J Hah

Nathanael D Heckmann

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this cross-sectional, observational study was to establish the relationship between standing lumbar lordosis (LL) and lateral decubitus LL.

Methods: Forty-nine subjects, 24 male and 25 female, were prospectively enrolled. Patients with pre-existing spinopelvic pathology were excluded. Standing, relaxed-seated, and lateral decubitus lateral radiographs were obtained. Radiographic variables measured included LL and lordosis change at each lumbar level (e.g. L1-L2). The change in LL when going from a standing to a lateral decubitus position (ΔLL), the correlation between standing and sitting LL compared to lateral decubitus LL, and the correlation between ΔLL and standing pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), PI-LL mismatch, pelvic femoral angle (PFA), and sacral slope (SS) were calculated.

Results: Subjects had an average age of 25.7 ± 2.3 years and body mass index of 24.1 ± 3.0 kg/m. On average, 11.9°±8.2° (range - 7° to 29°) of LL was lost when transitioning from a standing to the lateral decubitus position. Lateral decubitus LL had a higher correlation with standing LL (R = 0.725, p < 0.001) than with relaxed-seated LL (R = 0.434, p < 0.001). Standing PT and PI-LL mismatch had moderately negative correlations with ΔLL (R=-0.58 and R=-0.59, respectively, both p < 0.05). Standing PI and standing PFA had a low negative correlation with ΔLL (R=-0.31 and R=-0.44, respectively, both p < 0.05) Standing SS and LL had no correlation with ΔLL.

Conclusions: Standing LL was strongly correlated to lateral decubitus LL, although subjects lost an average of 11.9° from the standing to the lateral decubitus position. This has important implications for fusion in the lateral position.

References

Ozgur B, Aryan H, Pimenta L, Taylor W . Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006; 6(4):435-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012. View

Laws C, Coughlin D, Lotz J, Serhan H, Hu S . Direct lateral approach to lumbar fusion is a biomechanically equivalent alternative to the anterior approach: an in vitro study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 37(10):819-25. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823551aa. View

Kwon B, Kim D . Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Indications, Outcomes, and Complications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016; 24(2):96-105. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00208. View

Davis T, Bae H, Mok J, Rasouli A, Delamarter R . Lumbar plexus anatomy within the psoas muscle: implications for the transpsoas lateral approach to the L4-L5 disc. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(16):1482-7. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00962. View

Lykissas M, Aichmair A, Hughes A, Sama A, Lebl D, Taher F . Nerve injury after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 919 treated levels with identification of risk factors. Spine J. 2013; 14(5):749-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.066. View

Hijji F, Narain A, Bohl D, Ahn J, Long W, DiBattista J . Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of complication rates. Spine J. 2017; 17(10):1412-1419. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.022. View

Mills E, Treloar J, Idowu O, Shelby T, Alluri R, Hah R . Single position lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2021; 22(3):429-443. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.012. View

Pumberger M, Hughes A, Huang R, Sama A, Cammisa F, Girardi F . Neurologic deficit following lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2011; 21(6):1192-9. PMC: 3366130. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2087-9. View

Uribe J, Isaacs R, Youssef J, Khajavi K, Balzer J, Kanter A . Can triggered electromyography monitoring throughout retraction predict postoperative symptomatic neuropraxia after XLIF? Results from a prospective multicenter trial. Eur Spine J. 2015; 24 Suppl 3:378-85. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3871-8. View

10.

Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, Buchowski J, Coe J, Deinlein D . Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 37(12):1077-82. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823e15e2. View

11.

Zheng G, Wang C, Wang T, Hu W, Ji Q, Hu F . Relationship between postoperative lordosis distribution index and adjacent segment disease following L4-S1 posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15(1):129. PMC: 7119009. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01630-9. View

12.

Fei H, Li W, Sun Z, Jiang S, Chen Z . Effect of patient position on the lordosis and scoliosis of patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(32):e7648. PMC: 5556212. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007648. View

13.

Yasuda T, Hasegawa T, Yamato Y, Togawa D, Kobayashi S, Yoshida G . Effect of position on lumbar lordosis in patients with adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018; 29(5):530-534. DOI: 10.3171/2018.3.SPINE1879. View

14.

Harimaya K, Lenke L, Mishiro T, Bridwell K, Koester L, Sides B . Increasing lumbar lordosis of adult spinal deformity patients via intraoperative prone positioning. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(22):2406-12. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bab13b. View

15.

Agarwal V, Wildstein M, Tillman J, Pelkey W, Alamin T . Lumbar intersegmental spacing and angulation in the modified lateral decubitus position versus variants of prone positioning. Spine J. 2009; 9(7):580-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.002. View

16.

Heckmann N, Lieberman J . Spinopelvic Biomechanics and Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Primer for Clinical Practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021; 29(18):e888-e903. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00953. View

17.

Mills E, Wang J, Sanchez J, Ton A, Alluri R, Heckmann N . The Correlation Between Pelvic Motion and Lumbar Motion in Patients Presenting With a Lumbar Spinal Pathology: Implications for Assessing Dislocation Risk in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today. 2023; 20:101105. PMC: 10008832. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101105. View

18.

Heckmann N, McKnight B, Stefl M, Trasolini N, Ike H, Dorr L . Late Dislocation Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: Spinopelvic Imbalance as a Causative Factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100(21):1845-1853. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00078. View

19.

Stefl M, Lundergan W, Heckmann N, McKnight B, Ike H, Murgai R . Spinopelvic mobility and acetabular component position for total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B(1 Supple A):37-45. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0415.R1. View