Which Actions Contribute to the Development of an Interprofessional Learning and Working Culture in Nursing Homes? A Realist Action Study

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Sep 21

PMID 39306357

Authors

Frank H O Verbeek

Elvira S Nouwens

Marleen Hermien Lovink

Getty Huisman-de Waal

Cornelia R M G Fluit

Miranda Laurant

Anneke J A H van Vught

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Insights about what actions contributed to the development of an interprofessional learning and working culture were lacking for nursing homes. This study aimed to provide insight into the context and actions that trigger mechanisms for the development of an interprofessional learning and working culture in nursing homes.

Study Design: Realist evaluation action research was conducted from 2019 to 2023.

Setting And Participants: 11 teams in 6 Dutch nursing homes.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Questionnaires, focus group interviews and observations were used to identify actions, context factors and mechanisms. We used retroductive analysis to discuss how actions were related to the development of the culture. Actions were evaluated in terms of context and manner in which they contribute to the development.

Results: 21 actions were identified and clustered into two themes. Theme 1: improving person-centred care. Actions activated the mechanisms of critical reflective behaviour and collective ownership in a context of, among other things, clear roles and tasks, a stable and competent team, the presence of case managers and facilitating organisational factors such as time for reflection. Theme 2: getting to know and understand each other's expertise. Actions activated respectful relationships, collective ownership of goals and feeling appreciated for your work in a context of, among other things, team members who meet regularly and management supporting interprofessional working.

Conclusions: This research sheds light on how and in what manner-specific actions contribute to the development of an interprofessional learning and working culture in nursing homes. Depending on the context, the actions triggered the following mechanisms: critical reflective behaviour, collective ownership of goals, respectful/caring relationships and feeling appreciated for your work. These mechanisms are the underlying drivers of an interprofessional learning and working culture. This study provides valuable guidance for fostering collaborative and effective interprofessional dynamics in nursing homes.

References

Kitsios F, Kamariotou M . Job satisfaction behind motivation: An empirical study in public health workers. Heliyon. 2021; 7(4):e06857. PMC: 8085703. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06857. View

Wei H, Horns P, Sears S, Huang K, Smith C, Wei T . A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews about interprofessional collaboration: facilitators, barriers, and outcomes. J Interprof Care. 2022; 36(5):735-749. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2021.1973975. View

Gerritsen D, Leontjevas R, Prins M, van der Roest H . [Consequences of the COVID-19 measures for wellbeing aspects of long-term care residents]. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2022; 53(1). DOI: 10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2022.01.01. View

Verbeek F, van Lierop M, Meijers J, van Rossum E, Zwakhalen S, Laurant M . Facilitators for developing an interprofessional learning culture in nursing homes: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):178. PMC: 9945386. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09092-5. View

Drenth H, Krijnen W, van der Weerd L, Reinders J, Hobbelen H . Nursing home geriatric rehabilitation care and interprofessional collaboration; a practice-based study. BMC Geriatr. 2023; 23(1):539. PMC: 10478267. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04212-6. View

Schot E, Tummers L, Noordegraaf M . Working on working together. A systematic review on how healthcare professionals contribute to interprofessional collaboration. J Interprof Care. 2019; 34(3):332-342. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1636007. View

Nazir A, Unroe K, Tegeler M, Khan B, Azar J, Boustani M . Systematic review of interdisciplinary interventions in nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013; 14(7):471-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.005. View

Tsakitzidis G, Timmermans O, Callewaert N, Verhoeven V, Lopez-Hartmann M, Truijen S . Outcome Indicators on Interprofessional Collaboration Interventions for Elderly. Int J Integr Care. 2016; 16(2):5. PMC: 5015552. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2017. View

Wackerhausen S . Collaboration, professional identity and reflection across boundaries. J Interprof Care. 2009; 23(5):455-73. DOI: 10.1080/13561820902921720. View

10.

Espinoza P, Peduzzi M, Agreli H, Sutherland M . Interprofessional team member's satisfaction: a mixed methods study of a Chilean hospital. Hum Resour Health. 2018; 16(1):30. PMC: 6042408. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-018-0290-z. View

11.

Verbeek F, Lovink M, Laurant M, van Vught A . Developing an interprofessional learning and working culture to improve person-centred care in nursing homes: a realist action research protocol. BMJ Open. 2022; 12(3):e058319. PMC: 8943755. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058319. View

12.

Lovink M, Verbeek F, Persoon A, Huisman-de Waal G, Smits M, Laurant M . Developing an Evidence-Based Nursing Culture in Nursing Homes: An Action Research Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(3). PMC: 8835437. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031733. View

13.

Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S . Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (3):CD000072. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub2. View

14.

Snoeren M, Volbeda P, Niessen T, Abma T . Dutch care innovation units in elderly care: A qualitative study into students' perspectives and workplace conditions for learning. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015; 17:174-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2015.11.005. View

15.

Kenaszchuk C, Reeves S, Nicholas D, Zwarenstein M . Validity and reliability of a multiple-group measurement scale for interprofessional collaboration. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10:83. PMC: 2867963. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-83. View

16.

Bronstein L . A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Soc Work. 2003; 48(3):297-306. DOI: 10.1093/sw/48.3.297. View

17.

Wei H, Webb Corbett R, Ray J, Wei T . A culture of caring: the essence of healthcare interprofessional collaboration. J Interprof Care. 2019; 34(3):324-331. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1641476. View

18.

Rout A, Ashby S, Maslin-Prothero S, Masterson A, Priest H, Beach M . A literature review of interprofessional working and intermediate care in the UK. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 20(5-6):775-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03156.x. View

19.

Wong G, Westhorp G, Manzano A, Greenhalgh J, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T . RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations. BMC Med. 2016; 14(1):96. PMC: 4920991. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-016-0643-1. View

20.

Doornebosch A, Smaling H, Achterberg W . Interprofessional Collaboration in Long-Term Care and Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022; 23(5):764-777.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.028. View