Quantitative Assessment of Full-Time Equivalent Effort for Kilovoltage-Cone Beam Computed Tomography Guided Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Medical Physicists

Overview

Journal Pract Radiat Oncol

Publisher Elsevier

Specialties Oncology
Radiology

Date 2024 Sep 20

PMID 39303779

Authors

Natalie N Viscariello

Kristen McConnell

Joseph Harms

Joel A Pogue

Xenia Ray

Eric Laugeman

Richard A Popple

Dennis N Stanley

Carlos E Cardenas

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: With recent clinical adoption of online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) and the increased workload associated with adaptive radiation therapy (RT), proper staffing for medical physicists is paramount to safe clinical operation. However, there is currently no consensus on the full-time equivalent (FTE) requirements for safe administration of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided oART. This study aimed to quantitatively assess medical physics workload and staffing needs of a CBCT-guided oART program.

Methods And Materials: We conducted a detailed analysis of the CBCT-guided adaptive planning and treatment workflows, encompassing tasks such as patient consultation, treatment planning, plan review, training, quality assurance, and treatment delivery. Using data from machine logs, clinical database queries, and staff surveys, we present a framework for estimating FTE values for different staffing scenarios, considering medical physicists' roles as planners, adaptors, or both.

Results: FTE calculations, based on an example workload of 100 adaptive and 200 nonadaptive patients per year, for 3 staffing scenarios were provided: medical physicists as planners and adaptors (2.9 FTE), medical physicists as planners but not adaptors (2.6 FTE), and medical physicists as adaptors but not planners (1.4 FTE). These findings offer calculation guidance and benchmarks for staffing requirements in CBCT-guided oART programs, emphasizing the need for specific staffing models to accommodate the complexities of adaptive RT.

Conclusions: This study outlines a framework for calculating FTE requirements for medical physicists in a CBCT-guided oART program. By analyzing the processes for 3 common adaptive RT workflows, this work can provide effective workforce planning and resource allocation estimates. This analysis can be used either before the implementation of an oART program, for program development, or as a review of current practices to ensure operational efficiency and proper staffing levels are maintained.

References

Yock A, Ahmed M, Ayala-Peacock D, Chakravarthy A, Price M . Initial analysis of the dosimetric benefit and clinical resource cost of CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy for patients with cancers of the cervix or rectum. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 22(10):210-221. PMC: 8504593. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13425. View

Halvorsen P, Burmeister J, Hariharan N, Kim M, Lee B, Lincoln H . Resource Allocations for Common Radiation Oncology Procedures. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2023; 13(5):e423-e441. DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.03.012. View

Battista J, Clark B, Patterson M, Beaulieu L, Sharpe M, Schreiner L . Medical physics staffing for radiation oncology: a decade of experience in Ontario, Canada. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012; 13(1):3704. PMC: 5716143. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i1.3704. View

Tohyama N, Okamoto H, Shimomura K, Kurooka M, Kawamorita R, Ota S . A national survey on the medical physics workload of external beam radiotherapy in Japan†. J Radiat Res. 2023; 64(6):911-925. PMC: 10665301. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrad070. View

Marsh L, Rykers K, Sobolewski M . ACPSEM position paper on ROMP scope of practice and staffing levels for magnetic resonance linear accelerators. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023; 46(2):521-527. PMC: 10209343. DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01253-4. View

Kim M, Ford E, Smith W, Bowen S, Geneser S, Meyer J . A system for equitable workload distribution in clinical medical physics. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 22(12):186-193. PMC: 8664136. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13460. View

Zwart L, Ong F, Ten Asbroek L, van Dieren E, Koch S, Bhawanie A . Cone-beam computed tomography-guided online adaptive radiotherapy is feasible for prostate cancer patients. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022; 22:98-103. PMC: 9115122. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.009. View

Pokharel S, Pacheco A, Tanner S . Assessment of efficacy in automated plan generation for Varian Ethos intelligent optimization engine. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022; 23(4):e13539. PMC: 8992949. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13539. View

Malkoske K, Sixel K, Hunter R, Battista J . COMP Report: An updated algorithm to estimate medical physics staffing levels for radiation oncology. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 22(8):6-15. PMC: 8364262. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13364. View

10.

Schiff J, Price A, Stowe H, Laugeman E, Chin R, Hatscher C . Simulated computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2022; 175:144-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.026. View

11.

Schiff J, Laugeman E, Stowe H, Zhao X, Hilliard J, Hawk E . Prospective In Silico Evaluation of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided StereoTactic Adaptive Radiation Therapy (CT-STAR) for the Ablative Treatment of Ultracentral Thoracic Disease. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023; 8(6):101226. PMC: 10188549. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101226. View

12.

Stanley D, Harms J, Pogue J, Belliveau J, Marcrom S, McDonald A . A roadmap for implementation of kV-CBCT online adaptive radiation therapy and initial first year experiences. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(7):e13961. PMC: 10338842. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13961. View

13.

McComas K, Yock A, Darrow K, Shinohara E . Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy and Opportunity Cost. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023; 8(3):101034. PMC: 10238262. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101034. View