» Articles » PMID: 39302942

Additional Predictors of Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack in BEFAST Positive Patients in Out-of-hours Emergency Primary Care

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Sep 20
PMID 39302942
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: In patients suspected of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), rapid triaging is imperative to improve clinical outcomes. For this purpose, balance-eye-face-arm-speech-time (BEFAST) items are used in out-of-hours primary care (OHS-PC). We explored the risk of stroke and TIA among BEFAST positive patients calling to the OHS-PC, and assessed whether additional predictors could improve risk stratification.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of retrospectively gathered routine care data from telephone triage tape-recordings of patients calling the OHS-PC with neurological deficit symptoms, classified as BEFAST positive. Four models-with the predictors age, sex, a history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, and cardiovascular risk factors-were fitted using logistic regression to predict the outcome stroke or TIA. Likelihood ratio testing was used to select the best model, which was subsequently internally validated.

Results: The risk of stroke or TIA diagnosis was 52% among 1,289 BEFAST positive patients, median age 72 years, 56% female sex. Of patients with the outcome stroke/TIA, 24% received a low urgency allocation, while 92% had signs or symptoms when calling. Only the addition of age and sex improved predicting stroke or TIA (internally validated c-statistic 0.72, 95%CI 0.69-0.75). The predicted risk of stroke or TIA remained below 20% in those aged below 40. Females aged 70 or over and males aged 55 or over, had a predicted risk above 50%.

Discussion: Urgency allocation appears to be suboptimal in BEFAST positive patients calling the OHS-PC. Risk stratification could be improved in this setting by adding age and sex.

References
1.
Erkelens D, Rutten F, Wouters L, Dolmans L, de Groot E, Damoiseaux R . Accuracy of telephone triage in patients suspected of transient ischaemic attack or stroke: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2020; 21(1):256. PMC: 7719259. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01334-3. View

2.
Giesen P, Smits M, Huibers L, Grol R, Wensing M . Quality of after-hours primary care in the Netherlands: a narrative review. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(2):108-13. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00006. View

3.
Buck B, Akhtar N, Alrohimi A, Khan K, Shuaib A . Stroke mimics: incidence, aetiology, clinical features and treatment. Ann Med. 2021; 53(1):420-436. PMC: 7939567. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1890205. View

4.
Austin P, White I, Lee D, van Buuren S . Missing Data in Clinical Research: A Tutorial on Multiple Imputation. Can J Cardiol. 2020; 37(9):1322-1331. PMC: 8499698. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.11.010. View

5.
Duvekot M, Venema E, Rozeman A, Moudrous W, Vermeij F, Biekart M . Comparison of eight prehospital stroke scales to detect intracranial large-vessel occlusion in suspected stroke (PRESTO): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2021; 20(3):213-221. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30439-7. View