» Articles » PMID: 39301210

Subword Representations Successfully Decode Brain Responses to Morphologically Complex Written Words

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Sep 20
PMID 39301210
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study extends the idea of decoding word-evoked brain activations using a corpus-semantic vector space to multimorphemic words in the agglutinative Finnish language. The corpus-semantic models are trained on word segments, and decoding is carried out with word vectors that are composed of these segments. We tested several alternative vector-space models using different segmentations: no segmentation (whole word), linguistic morphemes, statistical morphemes, random segmentation, and character-level 1-, 2- and 3-grams, and paired them with recorded MEG responses to multimorphemic words in a visual word recognition task. For all variants, the decoding accuracy exceeded the standard word-label permutation-based significance thresholds at 350-500 ms after stimulus onset. However, the critical segment-label permutation test revealed that only those segmentations that were morphologically aware reached significance in the brain decoding task. The results suggest that both whole-word forms and morphemes are represented in the brain and show that neural decoding using corpus-semantic word representations derived from compositional subword segments is applicable also for multimorphemic word forms. This is especially relevant for languages with complex morphology, because a large proportion of word forms are rare and it can be difficult to find statistically reliable surface representations for them in any large corpus.

References
1.
Leminen A, Smolka E, Dunabeitia J, Pliatsikas C . Morphological processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly (compounding). Cortex. 2018; 116:4-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016. View

2.
Huth A, de Heer W, Griffiths T, Theunissen F, Gallant J . Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature. 2016; 532(7600):453-8. PMC: 4852309. DOI: 10.1038/nature17637. View

3.
Leminen A, Lehtonen M, Bozic M, Clahsen H . Editorial: Morphologically Complex Words in the Mind/Brain. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:47. PMC: 4754435. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00047. View

4.
Service E, Helenius P, Maury S, Salmelin R . Localization of syntactic and semantic brain responses using magnetoencephalography. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007; 19(7):1193-205. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1193. View

5.
Salmelin R . Clinical neurophysiology of language: the MEG approach. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006; 118(2):237-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.07.316. View