Informed Consent and Coercion in Recruitment Advertisements for Oocyte Donors

Overview

Journal BMC Womens Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2024 Sep 19

PMID 39300511

Authors

Ruby Lake

Isa Berzansky

Andrea Lanes

Serene Srouji

Elizabeth Ginsburg

Iris Insogna

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: As the use of donor eggs for in vitro treatment has increased, both medically affiliated and private donor egg agencies have turned to online advertisements to recruit donors. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine provides recommendations encouraging ethical recruitment of donors, however there is no formal regulation for the informed consent process for egg donor recruitment and compensation. Underrepresentation of risks and targeted financial incentives may pose a risk to the informed consent process.

Methods: Data from online advertisements for egg donors active between January 1 - August 31, 2020, were collected to analyze content related to risks, Covid-19 precautions, donor payment, and desired donor characteristics. Advertisements for egg donors on Google, Craigslist, and social media were analyzed. Primary outcomes included the mention of the risks of egg donation, including the risk of Covid-19 exposure, in donor egg advertisements. Secondary outcomes included language targeting specific donor characteristics and financial compensation.

Results: 103 advertisements were included. 35.9% (37/103) of advertisements mentioned some risk of the egg donation process, and 18.5% (19/103) mentioned risks or precautions related to Covid-19 exposure. Of advertisements for private donor egg agencies, 40.7% (24/59) mentioned any risk, compared to 29.6% (13/44) of medically affiliated egg donation programs; the difference was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.24). Agencies targeting students and donors of a specific race were more likely to offer payments over $10,000 for an egg donation cycle. Among advertisements offering over $20,000 for donor compensation, 72.7% (8/11) recruited women under the age of 21.

Conclusion: Egg donor recruitment advertisements, for both medically affiliated programs and private agencies, were unlikely to mention risks including the risk of exposure to Covid-19. Non-medically affiliated private donor egg agencies were more likely to violate multiple American Society for Reproductive Medicine ethics guidelines, including offering higher than average compensation, and recruiting donors from young and vulnerable populations.

References

Lafuente-Funes S, Weis C, Hudson N, Provoost V . Egg donation in the age of vitrification: A study of egg providers' perceptions and experiences in the UK, Belgium and Spain. Sociol Health Illn. 2022; 45(2):259-278. PMC: 10100196. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13590. View

. Financial compensation of oocyte donors: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2017; 106(7):e15-e19. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.040. View

Krawiec K . Egg-donor price fixing and Kamakahi v. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Virtual Mentor. 2014; 16(1):57-62. DOI: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2014.16.01.pfor1-1401. View

Bodri D, Guillen J, Polo A, Trullenque M, Esteve C, Coll O . Complications related to ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in 4052 oocyte donor cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008; 17(2):237-43. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60200-3. View

Alberta H, Berry R, Levine A . Risk disclosure and the recruitment of oocyte donors: are advertisers telling the full story?. J Law Med Ethics. 2014; 42(2):232-43. DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12138. View

Tober D, Garibaldi C, Blair A, Baltzell K . Alignment between expectations and experiences of egg donors: what does it mean to be informed?. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020; 12:1-13. PMC: 7530253. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.08.003. View

Kenney N, McGowan M . Looking back: egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle. Fertil Steril. 2008; 93(2):455-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.081. View

Freeman T . Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015; 33(1):45-63. PMC: 4900443. DOI: 10.1007/s40592-015-0018-y. View

Schuchat A . Public Health Response to the Initiation and Spread of Pandemic COVID-19 in the United States, February 24-April 21, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69(18):551-556. PMC: 7737947. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6918e2. View

10.

. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100(1):45-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.028. View

11.

Blyth E, Crawshaw M, Frith L, Jones C . Donor-conceived people's views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. J Law Med. 2012; 19(4):769-89. View

12.

Cahn N, Collins J . Fully informed consent for prospective egg donors. Virtual Mentor. 2014; 16(1):49-56. DOI: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2014.16.01.hlaw2-1401. View

13.

Gurmankin A . Risk information provided to prospective oocyte donors in a preliminary phone call. Am J Bioeth. 2002; 1(4):3-13. DOI: 10.1162/152651601317139207. View

14.

Resnik D . Bioethical Issues in Providing Financial Incentives to Research Participants. Medicoleg Bioeth. 2016; 5:35-41. PMC: 4719771. DOI: 10.2147/MB.S70416. View

15.

Keehn J, Howell E, Sauer M, Klitzman R . How Agencies Market Egg Donation on the Internet: A Qualitative Study. J Law Med Ethics. 2015; 43(3):610-8. PMC: 4663984. DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12303. View

16.

Alberta H, Berry R, Levine A . Compliance with donor age recommendations in oocyte donor recruitment advertisements in the USA. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013; 26(4):400-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.011. View