Comparison of Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management in Coronary Bypass Surgery

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2024 Sep 19

PMID 39295665

Authors

Vipul Sharma

Harika Atluri

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background Effective pain control is vital for patients undergoing heart surgery. Utilizing a multimodal approach to analgesia is essential, as poor pain management can result in hemodynamic and systemic complications. This study aimed to compare perioperative pain management techniques in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), specifically evaluating continuous thoracic epidural analgesia and ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae block. Methods This randomized comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care centre over a period of six months, with approval from the institute's ethics committee. A total of 24 patients undergoing CABG under general anesthesia participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) group (Group A) or the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block group (Group B) using a simple randomization method. The study assessed intraoperative intravenous opioid requirements for maintaining stable hemodynamics, as well as postoperative resting and coughing Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and peak inspiratory spirometry. Results Twelve patients from each group completed the study, with comparable demographics (age, gender). Both groups exhibited similar resting and coughing VAS scores at 0, 3, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively (p > 0.05). However, at 24, 36, and 48 hours, Group A had significantly higher VAS scores compared to Group B (p < 0.05). Group A maintained an overall mean VAS score of 4 or less during rest and coughing. Peak inspiratory spirometry results were consistent between both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion The ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae block provided pain control comparable to thoracic epidural analgesia, making it a viable alternative for perioperative pain management. This is particularly beneficial for CABG patients where early postoperative anticoagulant therapy is crucial for graft patency. Effective pain management also contributes to faster recovery in coronary artery bypass grafting.

References

Rosen D, Hawkinberry 2nd D, Rosen K, Gustafson R, Hogg J, Broadman L . An epidural hematoma in an adolescent patient after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004; 98(4):966-969. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000103267.37895.5B. View

Kelava M, Alfirevic A, Bustamante S, Hargrave J, Marciniak D . Regional Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery: An Overview of Fascial Plane Chest Wall Blocks. Anesth Analg. 2020; 131(1):127-135. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004682. View

Brandal D, Keller M, Lee C, Grogan T, Fujimoto Y, Gricourt Y . Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Opioid-Free Anesthesia on Opioid Prescriptions at Discharge From the Hospital: A Historical-Prospective Study. Anesth Analg. 2017; 125(5):1784-1792. PMC: 7402216. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002510. View

Cogan J . Pain management after cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010; 14(3):201-4. DOI: 10.1177/1089253210378401. View

Sandhu N, Maharlouei B, Patel B, Erkulwater E, Medabalmi P . Simultaneous bilateral infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks with low-dose lidocaine using ultrasound guidance. Anesthesiology. 2006; 104(1):199-201. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200601000-00028. View

Kwanten L, OBrien B, Anwar S . Opioid-Based Anesthesia and Analgesia for Adult Cardiac Surgery: History and Narrative Review of the Literature. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018; 33(3):808-816. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.05.053. View

Romero A, Garcia J, Joshi G . The state of the art in preventing postthoracotomy pain. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 25(2):116-24. DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2013.04.002. View

Bjornnes A, Parry M, Lie I, Fagerland M, Watt-Watson J, Rustoen T . The impact of an educational pain management booklet intervention on postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016; 16(1):18-27. DOI: 10.1177/1474515116631680. View

Finnerty D, McMahon A, McNamara J, Hartigan S, Griffin M, Buggy D . Comparing erector spinae plane block with serratus anterior plane block for minimally invasive thoracic surgery: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125(5):802-810. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.020. View

10.

Abdelgalil A, Ahmed A, Gamal R, Elshal M, Bakeer A, Shaker E . Ultrasound Guided Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Patient Controlled Analgesia in Open Nephrectomy for Renal Malignancies: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Pain Res. 2022; 15:3093-3102. PMC: 9531616. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S379721. View

11.

Scott J, Huskisson E . Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976; 2(2):175-84. View

12.

Allen D, Chae-Kim S, Trousdale D . Risks and complications of neuraxial anesthesia and the use of anticoagulation in the surgical patient. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2005; 15(4):369-73. PMC: 1276639. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2002.11927867. View

13.

. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2012; 116(2):248-73. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c1030. View

14.

Dhole S, Mehta Y, Saxena H, Juneja R, Trehan N . Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural and paravertebral blocks for postoperative analgesia after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2001; 15(3):288-92. DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2001.23271. View

15.

Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu U . Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2019; 59:84-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.06.036. View

16.

Ho A, Chung D, Joynt G . Neuraxial blockade and hematoma in cardiac surgery: estimating the risk of a rare adverse event that has not (yet) occurred. Chest. 2000; 117(2):551-5. DOI: 10.1378/chest.117.2.551. View

17.

Forero M, Adhikary S, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin K . The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016; 41(5):621-7. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451. View

18.

Bonvicini D, Tagliapietra L, Giacomazzi A, Pizzirani E . Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane blocks in breast cancer and reconstruction surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2017; 44:3-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.10.006. View