» Articles » PMID: 39294372

Endogenous Opioid Signalling Regulates Spinal Ependymal Cell Proliferation

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Sep 18
PMID 39294372
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

After injury, mammalian spinal cords develop scars to confine the lesion and prevent further damage. However, excessive scarring can hinder neural regeneration and functional recovery. These competing actions underscore the importance of developing therapeutic strategies to dynamically modulate scar progression. Previous research on scarring has primarily focused on astrocytes, but recent evidence has suggested that ependymal cells also participate. Ependymal cells normally form the epithelial layer encasing the central canal, but they undergo massive proliferation and differentiation into astroglia following certain injuries, becoming a core scar component. However, the mechanisms regulating ependymal proliferation in vivo remain unclear. Here we uncover an endogenous κ-opioid signalling pathway that controls ependymal proliferation. Specifically, we detect expression of the κ-opioid receptor, OPRK1, in a functionally under-characterized cell type known as cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neuron (CSF-cN). We also discover a neighbouring cell population that expresses the cognate ligand prodynorphin (PDYN). Whereas κ-opioids are typically considered inhibitory, they excite CSF-cNs to inhibit ependymal proliferation. Systemic administration of a κ-antagonist enhances ependymal proliferation in uninjured spinal cords in a CSF-cN-dependent manner. Moreover, a κ-agonist impairs ependymal proliferation, scar formation and motor function following injury. Together, our data suggest a paracrine signalling pathway in which PDYN cells tonically release κ-opioids to stimulate CSF-cNs and suppress ependymal proliferation, revealing an endogenous mechanism and potential pharmacological strategy for modulating scarring after spinal cord injury.

References
1.
Silver J, Miller J . Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004; 5(2):146-56. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1326. View

2.
Tran A, Warren P, Silver J . New insights into glial scar formation after spinal cord injury. Cell Tissue Res. 2021; 387(3):319-336. PMC: 8975767. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-021-03477-w. View

3.
Johansson C, Momma S, Clarke D, Risling M, Lendahl U, Frisen J . Identification of a neural stem cell in the adult mammalian central nervous system. Cell. 1999; 96(1):25-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80956-3. View

4.
Meletis K, Barnabe-Heider F, Carlen M, Evergren E, Tomilin N, Shupliakov O . Spinal cord injury reveals multilineage differentiation of ependymal cells. PLoS Biol. 2008; 6(7):e182. PMC: 2475541. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060182. View

5.
Sabelstrom H, Stenudd M, Reu P, Dias D, Elfineh M, Zdunek S . Resident neural stem cells restrict tissue damage and neuronal loss after spinal cord injury in mice. Science. 2013; 342(6158):637-40. DOI: 10.1126/science.1242576. View