Status and Subjective Well-being: A Conceptual Replication and Extension of Anderson Et Al. (2012)

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2024 Sep 18

PMID 39292652

Authors

Cameron Anderson

John Angus D Hildreth

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Does the status people possess shape their subjective well-being (SWB)? Prior research that has addressed this question has been correlational. Therefore, in the current research, we provide causal evidence of this effect: In two experiments, we found that individuals reported higher SWB when their own status was higher compared to when it was lower. However, individuals' SWB was not only shaped by their own status, but also by others' status. Specifically, individuals reported higher SWB when others' status was lower than when it was higher. Thus, people have a competitive orientation towards status; they not only want to have high status on an absolute level (e.g., to be highly respected and admired), but also to have higher status than others (e.g., to be more respected and admired than others). A standard self-affirmation manipulation was used in an attempt to mitigate individuals' competitive orientation towards status, but only helped already high-status members feel happier in groups of high-status members, rather than help low-status members feel happier when they uniquely held low status.

References

Hogan R . A socioanalytic theory of personality. Nebr Symp Motiv. 1983; :55-89. View

Kifer Y, Heller D, Perunovic W, Galinsky A . The good life of the powerful: the experience of power and authenticity enhances subjective well-being. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(3):280-8. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612450891. View

WATSON D, Clark L, Tellegen A . Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(6):1063-70. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. View

Diener E, Diener M, Diener C . Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995; 69(5):851-64. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.5.851. View

Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen R, Griffin S . The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985; 49(1):71-5. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. View

Gruenewald T, Kemeny M, Aziz N . Subjective social status moderates cortisol responses to social threat. Brain Behav Immun. 2006; 20(4):410-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2005.11.005. View

Leary M, Kelly K, Cottrell C, Schreindorfer L . Construct validity of the need to belong scale: mapping the nomological network. J Pers Assess. 2013; 95(6):610-24. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.819511. View

Anderson C, Kraus M, Galinsky A, Keltner D . The local-ladder effect: social status and subjective well-being. Psychol Sci. 2012; 23(7):764-71. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611434537. View

Anderson C, Hildreth J, Howland L . Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychol Bull. 2015; 141(3):574-601. DOI: 10.1037/a0038781. View

10.

Cohen G, Garcia J, Apfel N, Master A . Reducing the racial achievement gap: a social-psychological intervention. Science. 2006; 313(5791):1307-10. DOI: 10.1126/science.1128317. View

11.

Hardy C, van Vugt M . Nice guys finish first: the competitive altruism hypothesis. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006; 32(10):1402-13. DOI: 10.1177/0146167206291006. View

12.

Baumeister R, Leary M . The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull. 1995; 117(3):497-529. View

13.

Tay L, Diener E . Needs and subjective well-being around the world. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011; 101(2):354-65. DOI: 10.1037/a0023779. View

14.

Leary M, Cottrell C, Phillips M . Deconfounding the effects of dominance and social acceptance on self-esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001; 81(5):898-909. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.898. View

15.

Bockerman P, Ilmakunnas P . Unemployment and self-assessed health: evidence from panel data. Health Econ. 2008; 18(2):161-79. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1361. View

16.

Pickett C, Gardner W, Knowles M . Getting a cue: the need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004; 30(9):1095-107. DOI: 10.1177/0146167203262085. View

17.

Crocker J, Wolfe C . Contingencies of self-worth. Psychol Rev. 2001; 108(3):593-623. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.593. View

18.

Cheng J, Tracy J, Foulsham T, Kingstone A, Henrich J . Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012; 104(1):103-25. DOI: 10.1037/a0030398. View

19.

Tiedens L, Fragale A . Power moves: complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 84(3):558-68. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.84.3.558. View