» Articles » PMID: 39289720

User Profiles in Digitalized Healthcare: Active, Potential, and Rejecting - a Cross-sectional Study Using Latent Class Analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Sep 17
PMID 39289720
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is evidence of different use by different groups of people for general health-related applications. Yet, these findings are lacking for digitalized healthcare services. It is also unclear whether typical use patterns can be found and how user types can be characterized.

Methods: The analyses are based on data from 1 821 respondents to the Health Related Beliefs and Health Care Experiences in Germany panel (HeReCa). Digitalized healthcare services, that were used to determine the user types, include for example sick notes before/after examination and disease related training. User types were determined by latent class analysis. Individual groups were characterized using multinomial logistic regressions, taking into account socioeconomic and demographic factors as well as individual attitudes towards digitalization in the healthcare system.

Results: Three types were identified: rejecting (27.9%), potential (53.8%) and active (18.3%). Active participants were less likely to be employed, less likely to be highly educated and less skeptical of digital technologies. Potential users were the youngest, most highly-educated and most frequently employed group, with less skepticism than those who rejected. Rejecters were the oldest group, more likely to be female and of higher socio-economic status.

Conclusions: Socio-demographic and socio-economic differences were identified among three user types. It can therefore be assumed that not all population groups will benefit from the trend towards digitalization in healthcare. Steps should be taken to enhance access to innovations and ensure that everyone benefits from them.

References
1.
Nijland N, van Gemert-Pijnen J, Boer H, Steehouder M, Seydel E . Increasing the use of e-consultation in primary care: results of an online survey among non-users of e-consultation. Int J Med Inform. 2009; 78(10):688-703. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.06.002. View

2.
Flitcroft L, Chen W, Meyer D . The Demographic Representativeness and Health Outcomes of Digital Health Station Users: Longitudinal Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(6):e14977. PMC: 7381012. DOI: 10.2196/14977. View

3.
De Santis K, Jahnel T, Sina E, Wienert J, Zeeb H . Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021; 7(11):e32951. PMC: 8612128. DOI: 10.2196/32951. View

4.
Otokiti A, Williams K, Warsame L . Impact of Digital Divide on the Adoption of Online Patient Portals for Self-Motivated Patients. Healthc Inform Res. 2020; 26(3):220-228. PMC: 7438699. DOI: 10.4258/hir.2020.26.3.220. View

5.
Bhuyan S, Lu N, Chandak A, Kim H, Wyant D, Bhatt J . Use of Mobile Health Applications for Health-Seeking Behavior Among US Adults. J Med Syst. 2016; 40(6):153. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-016-0492-7. View